COMPARISON OF NDVI, EVI, AND SAVI METHODS TO KNOW VEGETATION DENSITY WITH LANDSAT 8 OIL IMAGES, 2019

Ilham Hasan Suardi, Dilla Anggraina
{"title":"COMPARISON OF NDVI, EVI, AND SAVI METHODS TO KNOW VEGETATION DENSITY WITH LANDSAT 8 OIL IMAGES, 2019","authors":"Ilham Hasan Suardi, Dilla Anggraina","doi":"10.24036/irsaj.v2i2.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine: (1) The level of vegetation density in Koto Tangah District, Padang City in 2019 using the NDVI, EVI, and SAVI methods, (2) The vegetation index method has the highest accuracy in predicting vegetation density in Koto Tangah District, Padang City. The type of research conducted is quantitative research, with research data in the form of Landsat 8 imagery data to identify the vegetation index NDVI, EVI, and SAVI. These indexes utilize a combination of bands on Landsat imagery. The value of the vegetation index can be calculated using the existing formula. carried out ArcGIS by using the raster calculator tool by entering the band values and calculations. In taking the accuracy test on the sample used a simple random sampling technique and using the Fitzpatricklens formula for each vegetation index method. Data collection techniques used are literature study, observation, and documentation. Meanwhile, the data analysis technique uses vegetation density analysis by looking at the accuracy of the NDVI, EVI, and SAVI methods. The results in this study indicate that each vegetation index is vulnerable, namely NDVI -1 -0.3 Very rare, -0.03- 0.15 Rare, 0.15 – 0.25 Medium, 0.25 – 0.35 Meeting, 0.35 – 1 Very Meeting, SAVI -1- -0.26 Very Rare, -0.26 – 0.29 Rare, 0.29-0.66 Moderate, 0.66-0.99 Meeting, 0.99-1 Very Meeting; EVI -0.99-0.1 Very Rare, 0.1-0.17 Rarely, 0.24-037 Moderate, 0.37-0.47 Meeting, 0.47-1 Very Meeting. the value results obtained that the area of the sub-district of Koto Tangah, the city of Padang, is dominated by high. Based on the research results of the three indices, the most dominating class is very dense vegetation density. The accuracy test results for the NDVI method were 86.95%, for the EVI method it was 86.95%, and for the SAVI method, it was 91.30%.","PeriodicalId":272417,"journal":{"name":"International Remote Sensing Applied Journal","volume":"118 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Remote Sensing Applied Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24036/irsaj.v2i2.28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to determine: (1) The level of vegetation density in Koto Tangah District, Padang City in 2019 using the NDVI, EVI, and SAVI methods, (2) The vegetation index method has the highest accuracy in predicting vegetation density in Koto Tangah District, Padang City. The type of research conducted is quantitative research, with research data in the form of Landsat 8 imagery data to identify the vegetation index NDVI, EVI, and SAVI. These indexes utilize a combination of bands on Landsat imagery. The value of the vegetation index can be calculated using the existing formula. carried out ArcGIS by using the raster calculator tool by entering the band values and calculations. In taking the accuracy test on the sample used a simple random sampling technique and using the Fitzpatricklens formula for each vegetation index method. Data collection techniques used are literature study, observation, and documentation. Meanwhile, the data analysis technique uses vegetation density analysis by looking at the accuracy of the NDVI, EVI, and SAVI methods. The results in this study indicate that each vegetation index is vulnerable, namely NDVI -1 -0.3 Very rare, -0.03- 0.15 Rare, 0.15 – 0.25 Medium, 0.25 – 0.35 Meeting, 0.35 – 1 Very Meeting, SAVI -1- -0.26 Very Rare, -0.26 – 0.29 Rare, 0.29-0.66 Moderate, 0.66-0.99 Meeting, 0.99-1 Very Meeting; EVI -0.99-0.1 Very Rare, 0.1-0.17 Rarely, 0.24-037 Moderate, 0.37-0.47 Meeting, 0.47-1 Very Meeting. the value results obtained that the area of the sub-district of Koto Tangah, the city of Padang, is dominated by high. Based on the research results of the three indices, the most dominating class is very dense vegetation density. The accuracy test results for the NDVI method were 86.95%, for the EVI method it was 86.95%, and for the SAVI method, it was 91.30%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ndvi、evi和savi方法在landsat 8石油图像中植被密度的比较,2019
本研究旨在:(1)利用NDVI、EVI和SAVI方法确定2019年巴东市上唐加区植被密度水平;(2)植被指数法预测巴东市上唐加区植被密度精度最高。研究类型为定量研究,研究数据为Landsat 8影像数据,识别植被指数NDVI、EVI和SAVI。这些指数利用陆地卫星图像上的波段组合。植被指数的取值可以使用现有的公式进行计算。利用栅格计算器工具进行ArcGIS,通过输入波段值进行计算。在对样本进行精度检验时,采用了简单的随机抽样技术,并对每一种植被指数方法采用了Fitzpatricklens公式。使用的数据收集技术有文献研究、观察和记录。同时,数据分析技术采用植被密度分析,考察NDVI、EVI和SAVI方法的精度。研究结果表明,各植被指数均具有脆弱性,分别为NDVI -1- 0.3 Very rare、-0.03- 0.15 rare、0.15 - 0.25 Medium、0.25 - 0.35 Meeting、0.35 -1 Very Meeting、SAVI -1- -0.26 Very rare、-0.26 - 0.29 rare、0.29-0.66 Moderate、0.66-0.99 Meeting、0.99-1 Very Meeting;EVI -0.99-0.1非常罕见,0.1-0.17很少,0.24-037中等,0.37-0.47会议,0.47-1非常会议。结果表明,巴东市古东唐加街道面积以高为主。从三个指标的研究结果来看,最具优势的一类是极密植被密度。NDVI法、EVI法和SAVI法的准确率分别为86.95%、86.95%和91.30%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
COMPARISON OF ASTER GDEM IMAGES AND SRTM IMAGES FOR RIVER WATERSHED AND GEOMORPHOLOGY STUDY MAPPING OF FOREST AND LAND FIRE HAZARDOUS USING LANDSAT 8 SATELLITE IMAGERY WITH LAND SURFACE TEMPERATURE (LST) AND NORMALIZED BURN RATIO (NBR) METHODS DETERMINATION OF CHANGES IN FIELD AREA WITH FOOD-SUPPORTING CAPACITY USING REMOTE SENSING IN AGAM UTILIZATION OF SENTINEL-2A IMAGERY FOR MAPPING THE DISTRIBUTION OF MANGROVE FORESTS IN THE MANDEH AREA, WEST SUMATERA PROVINCE DETERMINATION OF TH DYNAMICS OF THE FIELD AREA WITH FOOD SUPPORTUSING REMOTE SENSING IN SOLOK DISTRICT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1