Bringing Islamic Finance Home Through the Circular Economy Social Finance (Cesf) Discourse

M. Haneef
{"title":"Bringing Islamic Finance Home Through the Circular Economy Social Finance (Cesf) Discourse","authors":"M. Haneef","doi":"10.26650/b/ss10.2020.017.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper argues that the current Circular Economy and Social Finance (CESF) discourse allows Islamic economists to re-align Islamic Banking (IB) and Islamic Finance (IF) with its roots, i.e. Islamic economics. Notwithstanding the impressive growth figures of Islamic Banking/Finance over the last three decades, reservations are voiced especially on the role and impact of IF in Muslim communities. This paper begins by critically discussing, albeit briefly, selected tensions that have evolved in Islamic Banking literature over the decades that show the departure of IB from IE. The criticism of IB has moved away from merely focussing on contracts/instruments or the debt/equity debate of the 1980s and early 1990s to a substantive systemic focus on the role of IF in developing the real economy to enhance the welfare of society as a whole. Genuine Islamization of Knowledge approach can be a methodological framework that allows IB/IF to be re-connected to IE and to the epistemological bases of Islam. The paper then briefly presents the basic ideas in the CESF discourse and argues that its central features provide an opportunity to re-align the current direction taken by Islamic Banking/Finance. The goals of IB/IF must help achieve the overall socio-economic goals of society and not merely serve outdated neoclassical economics objectives of maximizing individual shareholder welfare, with no consideration for overall equity considerations in society. The paper then argues that the CESF discourse provides a golden opportunity to re-visit the theory of decision-making in economics. Utilizing selected literature written on interdependent utility functions, it is proposed that economic decision-making in Islamic economics must include a concern for others, including its environmental and human impact, something that is at the base of the CESF agenda. The paper generally adopts selected discourse/content analysis involving literature on the various component parts of the paper.","PeriodicalId":159163,"journal":{"name":"Islamic Perspective for Sustainable Financial System","volume":"123 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Islamic Perspective for Sustainable Financial System","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26650/b/ss10.2020.017.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper argues that the current Circular Economy and Social Finance (CESF) discourse allows Islamic economists to re-align Islamic Banking (IB) and Islamic Finance (IF) with its roots, i.e. Islamic economics. Notwithstanding the impressive growth figures of Islamic Banking/Finance over the last three decades, reservations are voiced especially on the role and impact of IF in Muslim communities. This paper begins by critically discussing, albeit briefly, selected tensions that have evolved in Islamic Banking literature over the decades that show the departure of IB from IE. The criticism of IB has moved away from merely focussing on contracts/instruments or the debt/equity debate of the 1980s and early 1990s to a substantive systemic focus on the role of IF in developing the real economy to enhance the welfare of society as a whole. Genuine Islamization of Knowledge approach can be a methodological framework that allows IB/IF to be re-connected to IE and to the epistemological bases of Islam. The paper then briefly presents the basic ideas in the CESF discourse and argues that its central features provide an opportunity to re-align the current direction taken by Islamic Banking/Finance. The goals of IB/IF must help achieve the overall socio-economic goals of society and not merely serve outdated neoclassical economics objectives of maximizing individual shareholder welfare, with no consideration for overall equity considerations in society. The paper then argues that the CESF discourse provides a golden opportunity to re-visit the theory of decision-making in economics. Utilizing selected literature written on interdependent utility functions, it is proposed that economic decision-making in Islamic economics must include a concern for others, including its environmental and human impact, something that is at the base of the CESF agenda. The paper generally adopts selected discourse/content analysis involving literature on the various component parts of the paper.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过循环经济社会金融(Cesf)话语将伊斯兰金融带回家
本文认为,当前的循环经济和社会金融(CESF)论述允许伊斯兰经济学家重新调整伊斯兰银行(IB)和伊斯兰金融(IF)与其根源,即伊斯兰经济学。尽管伊斯兰银行/金融在过去三十年中取得了令人印象深刻的增长数字,但对伊斯兰银行在穆斯林社区中的作用和影响仍有保留意见。本文首先批判性地讨论,尽管简要地,选择的紧张局势已经演变在伊斯兰银行文献几十年来,显示IB从IE的离开。对IB的批评已经从仅仅关注合同/工具或20世纪80年代和90年代初的债务/股权辩论转向实质性的系统性关注IF在发展实体经济以提高整个社会福利方面的作用。真正的知识伊斯兰化方法可以是一个方法论框架,允许IB/IF重新连接到IE和伊斯兰教的认识论基础。然后,本文简要介绍了CESF话语中的基本思想,并认为其核心特征提供了重新调整伊斯兰银行/金融当前方向的机会。IB/IF的目标必须有助于实现社会的整体社会经济目标,而不仅仅是服务于过时的新古典经济学目标,即最大化个人股东福利,而不考虑社会的整体公平考虑。本文认为,CESF的论述为重新审视经济学中的决策理论提供了一个绝佳的机会。利用有关相互依存效用函数的精选文献,作者提出,伊斯兰经济学中的经济决策必须包括对他人的关注,包括其对环境和人类的影响,这是CESF议程的基础。本文一般采用选择性的话语/内容分析,涉及论文各组成部分的文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Promoting Sdgs and Shared Prosperity: The Potential Role of Islamic Economics and Finance The Double Bottom Line Commitment And Microfinance Sustainability in Pakistan An Artificial Intelligence-based Islamic Fintech Model on Qardh-al-Hasan for Covid 19 Affected SMEs Circular Economy, Sustainable Development and the Role of Islamic Finance Bringing Islamic Finance Home Through the Circular Economy Social Finance (Cesf) Discourse
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1