“Protest? Bollocks!” On Public Perceptions of Punk in West Germany

Yvonne Robel
{"title":"“Protest? Bollocks!” On Public Perceptions of Punk in West Germany","authors":"Yvonne Robel","doi":"10.46586/mts.66.2021.89-110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article thematizes the phenomenon of punk as an example of “unconventional” and “unwelcomed” protest. It focuses on the public perception of West German punks from the late 1970s into the 1980s. In this early phase, punks caused confusion especially because of their alleged passivity. Their seeming rejection of a concept of being (politically) active was regarded as provocative, as the idea of “activity” largely dominated notions of legitimate political protest at that time. Punk was considered destructive and contentless, but non-political and as such “non-real” as a form of protest. Moreover, “experts” from the social sciences and pedagogy, politicians, and journalists interpreted the behaviour of the youth in social terms and responded to the “problem” with attempts to “understanding” and “help.” From their point of view too, Punks seemed to be unable to detect any political issues of their own or to fulfil notions of meaningful forms of protest. Using the example of punk perceptions, the article examines how collective knowledge about legitimate and proper forms of protest is negotiated through demarcations. \n ","PeriodicalId":218833,"journal":{"name":"Moving the Social","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Moving the Social","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46586/mts.66.2021.89-110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article thematizes the phenomenon of punk as an example of “unconventional” and “unwelcomed” protest. It focuses on the public perception of West German punks from the late 1970s into the 1980s. In this early phase, punks caused confusion especially because of their alleged passivity. Their seeming rejection of a concept of being (politically) active was regarded as provocative, as the idea of “activity” largely dominated notions of legitimate political protest at that time. Punk was considered destructive and contentless, but non-political and as such “non-real” as a form of protest. Moreover, “experts” from the social sciences and pedagogy, politicians, and journalists interpreted the behaviour of the youth in social terms and responded to the “problem” with attempts to “understanding” and “help.” From their point of view too, Punks seemed to be unable to detect any political issues of their own or to fulfil notions of meaningful forms of protest. Using the example of punk perceptions, the article examines how collective knowledge about legitimate and proper forms of protest is negotiated through demarcations.  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“抗议?胡说!”论西德公众对朋克的看法
这篇文章将朋克现象作为“非常规”和“不受欢迎”抗议的一个例子。它关注的是公众对20世纪70年代末至80年代西德朋克的看法。在这个早期阶段,朋克引起了混乱,特别是因为他们所谓的被动。他们表面上拒绝(政治上)积极的概念被认为是挑衅,因为“活动”的概念在当时很大程度上主导了合法政治抗议的概念。朋克被认为是破坏性的和不满足的,但非政治性的,因此作为一种抗议形式是“不真实的”。此外,来自社会科学和教育学的“专家”、政治家和记者从社会的角度来解释青年的行为,并试图“理解”和“帮助”来回应“问题”。从他们的角度来看,朋克似乎也无法察觉到他们自己的任何政治问题,也无法实现有意义的抗议形式的概念。本文以朋克观念为例,考察了关于合法和适当抗议形式的集体知识是如何通过界限进行谈判的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Meaning of Free Labour after the Second World War Unconditioned Freedom Beyond Wage Labour Changing Degrees of ‘Openness’ The Shadow Economy and Ideas of Freedom
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1