EROPANISASI KEBIJAKAN IMIGRASI DAN POLITISASI KEAMANAN IMIGRAN DI NEGARA-NEGARA VISEGRAD

Sugito Sugito
{"title":"EROPANISASI KEBIJAKAN IMIGRASI DAN POLITISASI KEAMANAN IMIGRAN DI NEGARA-NEGARA VISEGRAD","authors":"Sugito Sugito","doi":"10.24198/intermestic.v6n1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The wave of migration that hit the European Union since 2015 had a political and security impact on both EU institutions and its member states. The policy of sharing responsibility or immigrant quotas did not get agreement from the Visegrad countries. Several previous studies that used a constructivist approach explained that the rejection occurred due to the securitization of immigrants in each country. This article seeks to understand the resistance of the Visegrad states from a critical perspective by using the concept of politicization of security. The research method used is qualitative with an analysis of existing data in online news media, European Union documents, and scientific journals. The article found that the politicization of security toward immigrants in each Visegrad country happened on public discourse and political campaigns by government elites and political parties. The purpose of this security politicization was to perpetuate power relations.","PeriodicalId":111531,"journal":{"name":"Intermestic: Journal of International Studies","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intermestic: Journal of International Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24198/intermestic.v6n1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The wave of migration that hit the European Union since 2015 had a political and security impact on both EU institutions and its member states. The policy of sharing responsibility or immigrant quotas did not get agreement from the Visegrad countries. Several previous studies that used a constructivist approach explained that the rejection occurred due to the securitization of immigrants in each country. This article seeks to understand the resistance of the Visegrad states from a critical perspective by using the concept of politicization of security. The research method used is qualitative with an analysis of existing data in online news media, European Union documents, and scientific journals. The article found that the politicization of security toward immigrants in each Visegrad country happened on public discourse and political campaigns by government elites and political parties. The purpose of this security politicization was to perpetuate power relations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自2015年以来袭击欧盟的移民浪潮对欧盟机构及其成员国产生了政治和安全影响。分担责任或移民配额的政策没有得到维谢格拉德国家的同意。先前一些使用建构主义方法的研究解释说,拒绝是由于每个国家的移民证券化而发生的。本文试图利用安全政治化的概念,从批判的角度来理解维谢格拉德国家的抵抗。使用的研究方法是定性的,分析了在线新闻媒体、欧盟文件和科学期刊中的现有数据。文章发现,每个维谢格拉德国家的移民安全政治化都发生在政府精英和政党的公共话语和政治运动中。这种安全政治化的目的是使权力关系永久化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
EUROPEAN UNION'S FOREST FIRE POLICIES: STRENGTHENING POST-PANDEMIC AGE RESILIENCE. A CASE OF SOUTHERN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES Finland's Strategic Shift: A New Chapter with NATO Membership The Moonshine Policy: The Idiosyncrasy Factors of President Moon Jae-In in Improving Inter-Korean Relations Diplomasi Geoekonomi Cina di Kawasan Amerika Latin Studi Kasus: Hubungan Perdagangan Bebas Cina-Peru The Geopolitical Implications of Post-Diplomatic Normalization in the Middle East on Saudi-Iran Relations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1