Wis 19:13-17 and the Civil Rights of the Jews of Alexandria

L. Mazzinghi
{"title":"Wis 19:13-17 and the Civil Rights of the Jews of Alexandria","authors":"L. Mazzinghi","doi":"10.1515/9783110186598.53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wisdom 19:13-17 constitutes a pericope which is undoubtedly a little surprising as well as not well known. What does it actually mean to put a passage containing a fierce polemic against the Egyptians, placed in direct comparison with the evil men of Sodom, as almost the conclusion of the book? What motives lie behind this passage? The aim of my work is twofold: first of all, it is a question of taking up again the examination of this passage, which has been studied only by M. Priotto in a study of 1984, apart from the classic commentaries of Larcher, Winston, Vílchez Líndez and Scarpat.1 Secondly, after the passage has been situated in the larger context represented by chapter 19 of the Book of Wisdom, it is used to shed light on a particular problem: what does this passage tells us about the difficult problem of the civil rights of the Jews of Alexandria? Priotto’s work has only touched on this question.2 It has been gone into more deeply in the commentary of Vílchez Líndez3 which refers to the classic studies on the problem of the civil rights of the Jews of Alexandria (cf. below). Let me say at once that it will not be possible to offer anything really new in the exegetical field. In fact, nothing has substantially changed, following the work of Priotto, apart from a few points which I am seeking to highlight. Moreover, as far as the problem of the rights of the Jews of Alexandria is concerned, it is a question, for the most part, of refining several aspects which have already been brought to light in existing work. However, in this type of work it is useful to do a bit of preliminary tidying-up. Before tackling the topic that most concerns us, that is the problem of the civil rights of the Jews of Alexandria, we must briefly take stock of the situation with regard to our pericope. Here it is in my own translation:","PeriodicalId":393675,"journal":{"name":"Deuterocanonical and Cognate Literature. Yearbook","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Deuterocanonical and Cognate Literature. Yearbook","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110186598.53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Wisdom 19:13-17 constitutes a pericope which is undoubtedly a little surprising as well as not well known. What does it actually mean to put a passage containing a fierce polemic against the Egyptians, placed in direct comparison with the evil men of Sodom, as almost the conclusion of the book? What motives lie behind this passage? The aim of my work is twofold: first of all, it is a question of taking up again the examination of this passage, which has been studied only by M. Priotto in a study of 1984, apart from the classic commentaries of Larcher, Winston, Vílchez Líndez and Scarpat.1 Secondly, after the passage has been situated in the larger context represented by chapter 19 of the Book of Wisdom, it is used to shed light on a particular problem: what does this passage tells us about the difficult problem of the civil rights of the Jews of Alexandria? Priotto’s work has only touched on this question.2 It has been gone into more deeply in the commentary of Vílchez Líndez3 which refers to the classic studies on the problem of the civil rights of the Jews of Alexandria (cf. below). Let me say at once that it will not be possible to offer anything really new in the exegetical field. In fact, nothing has substantially changed, following the work of Priotto, apart from a few points which I am seeking to highlight. Moreover, as far as the problem of the rights of the Jews of Alexandria is concerned, it is a question, for the most part, of refining several aspects which have already been brought to light in existing work. However, in this type of work it is useful to do a bit of preliminary tidying-up. Before tackling the topic that most concerns us, that is the problem of the civil rights of the Jews of Alexandria, we must briefly take stock of the situation with regard to our pericope. Here it is in my own translation:
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
威19:13-17以及亚历山德里亚犹太人的民权
智慧19:13-17构成了一个毫无疑问有点令人惊讶,也不为人所知的伯利克里。把一段激烈反对埃及人的文章,与邪恶的索多玛人直接比较,作为全书的结尾,到底是什么意思?这篇文章背后的动机是什么?我的工作有两个目的:首先,这是一个重新审视这段话的问题,除了拉彻、温斯顿、Vílchez Líndez和斯卡帕特的经典评论外,只有普里奥托先生在1984年的一项研究中研究过这段话。其次,在这段话被置于《智慧之书》第19章所代表的更大的背景下之后,它被用来阐明一个特定的问题:关于亚历山德里亚犹太人的公民权利这个难题,这段话告诉了我们什么?Priotto的工作只是触及了这个问题这在Vílchez Líndez3的评论中有更深入的探讨,该评论提到了关于亚历山大犹太人公民权利问题的经典研究(见下文)。让我马上说,在训诂学领域,不可能提供任何真正新的东西。事实上,在普里奥托的工作之后,除了我想强调的几点之外,没有任何实质性的改变。此外,就亚历山大港犹太人的权利问题而言,在很大程度上,这是一个提炼现有工作中已经揭示的几个方面的问题。然而,在这种类型的工作中,做一些初步的整理是有用的。在讨论我们最关心的话题,即亚历山大港犹太人的公民权利问题之前,我们必须简要回顾一下我们的伯利克里的情况。下面是我自己的翻译:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“Our Forefathers Never Triumphed by Arms…” Abraham and His Offspring in the Pauline Writings Theological Hermeneutics and Historical Motifs in Pss 105-106 The Function of History in Early Rabbinic Liturgy Stephen’s Speech Before the Sanhedrin Against the Background of the Summaries of the History of Israel (Acts 7)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1