A study on the development and implications of low-yield nuclear weapons, focusing on deterrence theory

Sung-Young Moon
{"title":"A study on the development and implications of low-yield nuclear weapons, focusing on deterrence theory","authors":"Sung-Young Moon","doi":"10.37944/jams.v4i3.132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to examine the development status and technical characteristics of low-yield nuclear weapons initiated by the Trump administration, predict the development trend in the Biden administration, analyze strategic implications that have affected the R.O.K.-U.S. Tailored Deterrence Strategy, and seek future countermeasures.\nRegarding deterrence theory, low-power nuclear weapons are evaluated as a means of simultaneously expanding deterrence by denial and by retaliation. Additionally, low-yield nuclear weapons can be evaluated as having the capability, communication of nuclear retaliation wills and possibilities, and credibility for these wills and capabilities, which are 3C elements of deterrence in that they are “possible-use nuclear weapons.” Hence, they can be evaluated as highly-applicable deterrence means. As North Korea's nuclear and missile capabilities have advanced and the U.S. is developing and deploying low-yield nuclear weapons, this article intends to make several suggestions regarding deterrence and response. First, because North Korea's policy to strengthen its tactical nuclear capabilities in 2021 is inevitably closely related to the technical characteristics of the development of low-yield nuclear weapons, it should be evaluated and prepared in connection with this. Second, it is necessary to understand the Biden administration's nuclear strategy regarding the extended deterrence strategy of the U.S. and discuss it closely based on the 5th NPR unveiled in early 2022. Third, to ensure the credibility of the R.O.K.-U.S. tailored deterrence strategy, “multilateral deterrence measures” must be considered at the regional level, including low-yield nuclear weapons.","PeriodicalId":355992,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Military Studies","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Military Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37944/jams.v4i3.132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to examine the development status and technical characteristics of low-yield nuclear weapons initiated by the Trump administration, predict the development trend in the Biden administration, analyze strategic implications that have affected the R.O.K.-U.S. Tailored Deterrence Strategy, and seek future countermeasures. Regarding deterrence theory, low-power nuclear weapons are evaluated as a means of simultaneously expanding deterrence by denial and by retaliation. Additionally, low-yield nuclear weapons can be evaluated as having the capability, communication of nuclear retaliation wills and possibilities, and credibility for these wills and capabilities, which are 3C elements of deterrence in that they are “possible-use nuclear weapons.” Hence, they can be evaluated as highly-applicable deterrence means. As North Korea's nuclear and missile capabilities have advanced and the U.S. is developing and deploying low-yield nuclear weapons, this article intends to make several suggestions regarding deterrence and response. First, because North Korea's policy to strengthen its tactical nuclear capabilities in 2021 is inevitably closely related to the technical characteristics of the development of low-yield nuclear weapons, it should be evaluated and prepared in connection with this. Second, it is necessary to understand the Biden administration's nuclear strategy regarding the extended deterrence strategy of the U.S. and discuss it closely based on the 5th NPR unveiled in early 2022. Third, to ensure the credibility of the R.O.K.-U.S. tailored deterrence strategy, “multilateral deterrence measures” must be considered at the regional level, including low-yield nuclear weapons.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以威慑理论为重点,研究低当量核武器的发展及其影响
本研究旨在考察特朗普政府启动的低当量核武器的发展现状和技术特点,预测拜登政府的发展趋势,分析影响韩美定制威慑战略的战略含义,并寻求未来的对策。在威慑理论方面,低功率核武器被评估为通过拒止和报复同时扩大威慑的手段。此外,低当量核武器可以被评估为具有核报复意愿和可能性的能力、沟通能力以及这些意愿和能力的可信度,这是威慑的3C要素,因为它们是“可能使用的核武器”。因此,它们可以被评估为高度适用的威慑手段。随着朝鲜核武器和导弹能力的进步,以及美国正在开发和部署低当量核武器,本文打算就威慑和应对提出几点建议。首先,朝鲜在2021年加强战术核能力的政策,不可避免地与低当量核武器发展的技术特点密切相关,因此应据此进行评估和准备。其次,有必要了解拜登政府关于美国延伸威慑战略的核战略,并以2022年初公布的第5次《核态势报告》为基础进行密切讨论。第三,为了确保韩美量身定制的威慑战略的可信度,必须在地区层面考虑包括低当量核武器在内的“多边威慑措施”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of future defense policy priorities with AHP Monte Carlo simulation-based defect ratio estimation approach for a chemical materials stockpile reliability program Combat effectiveness and efficiency evaluation of firearm weapon systems in different projectile guidance simulations Authentic leadership and job burnout: Mediating effects of positive psychological capitals Development plan based on analyzing the actual conditions of Korea's defense base area
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1