{"title":"MUNDANE SCIENCE FICTION: LOSS OF DREAMS OR MATURITY?","authors":"Nataliya Krynytska","doi":"10.32589/2411-3883.18.2021.246854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the paper is to study the role of the mundane in contemporary culture based on the mundane science fiction (MSF). The term originated in 2004 thanks to «The Mundane Manifesto» by Geoff Ryman and his anonymous co-authors who argued for a focus on the modern science paradigm instead of dreams of outer space. The Manifesto outlines SF subgenre, where the setting is in the near future on the Earth or within the Solar System, excluding interstellar travel or contact with aliens. MSF suggests the believable use of technology and science, as it exists at the current time or a plausible extension of existing technology. There is a debate about the genre limits and its canonical works since it also covers cyberpunk, dystopia, etc. Remarkably, in the Soviet literature, such a genre called «near-future science fiction» existed in the 1940s and 1950s. It is a subgenre of «hard» SF focusing on the inventions useful for the national economy and lacking psychological depth of characters. This literature mostly had low artistic quality because of the Soviet ideological pressure and many limitations.The benefits of the paper are the following. First, the author distinguishes between two ma in approaches to SF, namely a more practical and literal reception and a more metaphorical reception. The former is characteristic of readers of realistic literature who try to find the true-to-life elements in SF blamed as escapism. The latter is close to the SF fans. However, blaming SF for escapism seems an excessive sociologizing of literature and ignoring the great role of metaphor in cultural development. Consequently, MSF is an effort to bridge a gap between SF and realistic literature. Second, the paper presents the first attempt to compare MSF to the Soviet «near-future SF». The author argues that since such a «near-future SF» occupies a niche in Western literature, it is a sign of the global changesthat are taking place during the lifetime of the current generation, bringing, in addition to progress, the acute threat of environmental catastrophe. Moreover, the role of neo Marxism, on the one hand, and technophobia, on the other hand, are emphasized. Third, for the first time the possible connections between MSF and the frontier myth important for the American national cultural mythology are studied. At the core of Kim Stanley Robinson’s novel «Aurora» (2015) and James Gray’s movie «Ad Astra» (2019), MSF is regarded as a rejection of the ideology «space: the final frontier». Both works shift the focus from the global to the personal, from the unusual to the mundane, from expansion and colonization to the internal problems. The author concludes that the anthropological turn occurs in SF as well: there is a loss of metaphor, allegory, and archetypal basis, an abandonment of escapism, Enlightenment utopianism, belief in progress, romanticism, and industrialism in favor of more realistic view on the future of humankind. Unfortunately, in many cases, «mundane» means not only «mature» but «boring» here, making SF more science than fiction.","PeriodicalId":336212,"journal":{"name":"CONTEMPORARY LITERARY STUDIES","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CONTEMPORARY LITERARY STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32589/2411-3883.18.2021.246854","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The aim of the paper is to study the role of the mundane in contemporary culture based on the mundane science fiction (MSF). The term originated in 2004 thanks to «The Mundane Manifesto» by Geoff Ryman and his anonymous co-authors who argued for a focus on the modern science paradigm instead of dreams of outer space. The Manifesto outlines SF subgenre, where the setting is in the near future on the Earth or within the Solar System, excluding interstellar travel or contact with aliens. MSF suggests the believable use of technology and science, as it exists at the current time or a plausible extension of existing technology. There is a debate about the genre limits and its canonical works since it also covers cyberpunk, dystopia, etc. Remarkably, in the Soviet literature, such a genre called «near-future science fiction» existed in the 1940s and 1950s. It is a subgenre of «hard» SF focusing on the inventions useful for the national economy and lacking psychological depth of characters. This literature mostly had low artistic quality because of the Soviet ideological pressure and many limitations.The benefits of the paper are the following. First, the author distinguishes between two ma in approaches to SF, namely a more practical and literal reception and a more metaphorical reception. The former is characteristic of readers of realistic literature who try to find the true-to-life elements in SF blamed as escapism. The latter is close to the SF fans. However, blaming SF for escapism seems an excessive sociologizing of literature and ignoring the great role of metaphor in cultural development. Consequently, MSF is an effort to bridge a gap between SF and realistic literature. Second, the paper presents the first attempt to compare MSF to the Soviet «near-future SF». The author argues that since such a «near-future SF» occupies a niche in Western literature, it is a sign of the global changesthat are taking place during the lifetime of the current generation, bringing, in addition to progress, the acute threat of environmental catastrophe. Moreover, the role of neo Marxism, on the one hand, and technophobia, on the other hand, are emphasized. Third, for the first time the possible connections between MSF and the frontier myth important for the American national cultural mythology are studied. At the core of Kim Stanley Robinson’s novel «Aurora» (2015) and James Gray’s movie «Ad Astra» (2019), MSF is regarded as a rejection of the ideology «space: the final frontier». Both works shift the focus from the global to the personal, from the unusual to the mundane, from expansion and colonization to the internal problems. The author concludes that the anthropological turn occurs in SF as well: there is a loss of metaphor, allegory, and archetypal basis, an abandonment of escapism, Enlightenment utopianism, belief in progress, romanticism, and industrialism in favor of more realistic view on the future of humankind. Unfortunately, in many cases, «mundane» means not only «mature» but «boring» here, making SF more science than fiction.
本文的目的是在世俗科幻小说的基础上研究世俗在当代文化中的作用。这个词起源于2004年Geoff Ryman和他的匿名合著者的《世俗宣言》,他们主张关注现代科学范式,而不是外太空的梦想。《宣言》概述了科幻亚类型,它的背景是在不久的将来的地球或太阳系内,不包括星际旅行或与外星人接触。MSF建议可信地使用技术和科学,因为它存在于当前时间或现有技术的合理扩展。关于类型限制和它的经典作品存在争议,因为它也涵盖了赛博朋克,反乌托邦等。值得注意的是,在20世纪40年代和50年代的苏联文学中,存在着一种叫做“近未来科幻小说”的类型。它是“硬”科幻小说的一个亚类型,侧重于对国民经济有用的发明,缺乏人物的心理深度。由于苏联的意识形态压力和诸多限制,这些文学作品的艺术质量大多不高。本文的优点如下。首先,作者区分了科幻小说的两种主要接受方式,即更实际和字面的接受方式和更隐喻的接受方式。前者是现实主义文学读者的特征,他们试图在科幻小说中找到被称为逃避主义的真实元素。后者接近科幻迷。然而,将科幻小说归咎于逃避主义似乎是对文学的过度社会化,忽视了隐喻在文化发展中的巨大作用。因此,《无国界医生》试图弥合科幻小说和现实主义文学之间的鸿沟。其次,本文首次尝试将MSF与苏联的“近未来SF”进行比较。作者认为,由于这种“近未来的科幻小说”在西方文学中占有一席之地,它是当代人一生中正在发生的全球变化的标志,除了进步之外,还带来了环境灾难的严重威胁。此外,新马克思主义的作用,一方面,技术恐惧症,另一方面,被强调。第三,首次研究了MSF与边疆神话之间的可能联系,这对美国民族文化神话具有重要意义。在金·斯坦利·罗宾逊(Kim Stanley Robinson)的小说《极光》(2015)和詹姆斯·格雷(James Gray)的电影《阿斯特拉》(2019)中,无国界医生被视为对“空间:最后的边界”意识形态的拒绝。两部作品都将焦点从全球转向个人,从不寻常转向平凡,从扩张和殖民转向内部问题。作者的结论是,科幻小说也出现了人类学的转向:隐喻、寓言和原型基础的缺失,逃避主义、启蒙乌托邦主义、对进步的信仰、浪漫主义和工业主义的放弃,对人类未来的看法更加现实。不幸的是,在许多情况下,“平凡”不仅意味着“成熟”,而且意味着“无聊”,这使得科幻小说比小说更科学。