Stellung des griechischen rechts in der antiken Rechtsgeschichte

J. Hengstl
{"title":"Stellung des griechischen rechts in der antiken Rechtsgeschichte","authors":"J. Hengstl","doi":"10.17159/2411-7870/2015/v21n1a3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ancient world saw the rise and fall of many cultures, with accompanying cultural exchanges and reciprocal influences. It seems that such reciprocal influences and exchanges extended to the law as well, and affected legal evolution. Old legal institutions were preserved for future generations but were influenced by newer cultures. This concept is not new, but Barta has revived it. He has embarked on a publication comprising four volumes, of which volumes 1, 2 (pt1/2) and 3 (pt 1) have appeared. The author has set out to prove that the influence of Greek law on Roman law was greater than has been acknowledged up until now, that Greek law was likewise influenced by the Old Orient, and that Roman law also influenced later legal systems. The one concern of this article is to show that Barta's theory is invalid. The other concern is to criticise Barta's approach. He does not cite the extensive literature on which he relies, but quotes it. He fills page after page with texts by other authors but does not discuss nor analyse their content. Thus the reader is provided with a wide range of legal literature of the past, but not with any critical analysis of it. Newer writing is often neglected. Barta himself has interesting ideas, but it is difficult to detect them, hidden as they are amongst the cited literature. This approach is followed in all volumes but is scientifically unacceptable and merits the strongest criticism.","PeriodicalId":338511,"journal":{"name":"Fundamina: a Journal of Legal History","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fundamina: a Journal of Legal History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2411-7870/2015/v21n1a3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ancient world saw the rise and fall of many cultures, with accompanying cultural exchanges and reciprocal influences. It seems that such reciprocal influences and exchanges extended to the law as well, and affected legal evolution. Old legal institutions were preserved for future generations but were influenced by newer cultures. This concept is not new, but Barta has revived it. He has embarked on a publication comprising four volumes, of which volumes 1, 2 (pt1/2) and 3 (pt 1) have appeared. The author has set out to prove that the influence of Greek law on Roman law was greater than has been acknowledged up until now, that Greek law was likewise influenced by the Old Orient, and that Roman law also influenced later legal systems. The one concern of this article is to show that Barta's theory is invalid. The other concern is to criticise Barta's approach. He does not cite the extensive literature on which he relies, but quotes it. He fills page after page with texts by other authors but does not discuss nor analyse their content. Thus the reader is provided with a wide range of legal literature of the past, but not with any critical analysis of it. Newer writing is often neglected. Barta himself has interesting ideas, but it is difficult to detect them, hidden as they are amongst the cited literature. This approach is followed in all volumes but is scientifically unacceptable and merits the strongest criticism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
希腊法律在古代法律历史中的地位
古代世界见证了许多文化的兴衰,伴随着文化的交流和相互影响。这种相互的影响和交流似乎也延伸到了法律上,并影响了法律的演变。旧的法律制度为后代保留下来,但受到新文化的影响。这个概念并不新鲜,但巴尔塔让它复活了。他已着手出版一本书,共四卷,其中第一卷、第二卷(p1 /2)和第三卷(p1)已经出版。作者试图证明,希腊法对罗马法的影响比迄今为止所承认的要大,希腊法同样受到古东方的影响,罗马法也影响了后来的法系。本文的一个关注点是证明Barta的理论是无效的。另一个担忧是批评巴塔的做法。他没有引用他所依赖的大量文献,而是引用它们。他一页又一页地写满了其他作者的文章,但没有讨论或分析它们的内容。因此,为读者提供了广泛的过去的法律文献,但没有任何批判性的分析。较新的作品常常被忽视。巴尔塔自己也有一些有趣的想法,但很难发现它们,因为它们隐藏在被引用的文献中。这种方法在所有卷中都遵循,但在科学上是不可接受的,应该受到最强烈的批评。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The first Edinburgh chair in law : Grotius and the Scottish Enlightenment Carta sine litteris. Enea silvio piccolomini und die urkundenpraxis im frühmittelalter Recherches sur la notion de patientia dans la vie politique a rome (de cesar a hadrien) : article Some considerations on the expression "Loco Filiae" in Gaius' Institutes In memoriam: Professor HJ Erasmus 10 January 1935 - 15 June 2016
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1