Shareholder Primacy Theory vs. Stakeholder Theory

J. Hung
{"title":"Shareholder Primacy Theory vs. Stakeholder Theory","authors":"J. Hung","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3564804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents the practice of shareholder primacy theory and stakeholder theory, with the support of relevant laws and examples in American and British contexts. Here the article argues that managers following shareholder primacy theory should always act in a manner that they reasonably believe they are serving the best interests of the corporation. Such a belief does not exclude directors and managers from considering the interests of non-shareholders as whether “the best interests of the corporation” encompass non-shareholders’ benefits is arguable. In addition, this article discusses corporate social responsibility (CSR) and argues how CSR is related to the practice of stakeholder theory and an improvement of both public and corporate interests.","PeriodicalId":201560,"journal":{"name":"CGN: Other Corporate Governance: Social Responsibility & Social Impact (Topic)","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CGN: Other Corporate Governance: Social Responsibility & Social Impact (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3564804","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article presents the practice of shareholder primacy theory and stakeholder theory, with the support of relevant laws and examples in American and British contexts. Here the article argues that managers following shareholder primacy theory should always act in a manner that they reasonably believe they are serving the best interests of the corporation. Such a belief does not exclude directors and managers from considering the interests of non-shareholders as whether “the best interests of the corporation” encompass non-shareholders’ benefits is arguable. In addition, this article discusses corporate social responsibility (CSR) and argues how CSR is related to the practice of stakeholder theory and an improvement of both public and corporate interests.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
股东至上理论与利益相关者理论
本文以英美两国的相关法律和案例为支撑,介绍了股东至上理论和利益相关者理论的实践。本文认为,遵循股东至上理论的管理者应该始终以一种他们有理由相信自己是在为公司的最佳利益服务的方式行事。这种信念并不排除董事和经理考虑非股东的利益,因为“公司的最佳利益”是否包括非股东的利益是有争议的。此外,本文还对企业社会责任进行了探讨,并论证了企业社会责任与利益相关者理论的实践以及公众利益和企业利益的改善之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How Cybernetics Explains Behavioural Tensegrity and its Advantages for Organisations The Agency Costs of Sustainable Capitalism The Performance of Environmental, Social, and Governance Investment in Thailand Primary Corporate Bond Markets and Social Responsibility Should the Modern Corporation Maximize Shareholder Value?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1