The Origins of Agile and Iterative Methods

Andrew Whiteley, Julien Pollack, P. Matouš
{"title":"The Origins of Agile and Iterative Methods","authors":"Andrew Whiteley, Julien Pollack, P. Matouš","doi":"10.19255/JMPM02502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Agile methods and iterative and incremental development (IID) have attracted significant attention in recent years. They are widely applied in many industries quite dissimilar to their origins in manufacturing and information system development. Agile methods and IID are part of a rich stream of research and practice that can be traced back to the 1930’s, but much of this history has been lost in recent rhetoric about these methods. The purpose of this paper is to consolidate the many streams of research and practice that have contributed to agile and IID forms of project management. This paper presents a systematic literature review connecting the fragmented streams of academic and applied literature that have historically contributed to the development of agile methods and IID, allowing a deeper view of past recent iterations of how these methods are commonly represented. We argue that although the roots of the currently popular approaches can be traced back to 1930s’, these have been mostly disassociated from present agile and IID practices due to a combination of barriers to transfer of knowledge such as divergent use of language and terminology between fields, attention decay, and the current industry-led narrative. Mapping and clarifying these historical links provides a useful perspective on contemporary project management practice and opens further possibilities for deeper research into agile project management methods.","PeriodicalId":320094,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Modern Project Management","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Modern Project Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19255/JMPM02502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Agile methods and iterative and incremental development (IID) have attracted significant attention in recent years. They are widely applied in many industries quite dissimilar to their origins in manufacturing and information system development. Agile methods and IID are part of a rich stream of research and practice that can be traced back to the 1930’s, but much of this history has been lost in recent rhetoric about these methods. The purpose of this paper is to consolidate the many streams of research and practice that have contributed to agile and IID forms of project management. This paper presents a systematic literature review connecting the fragmented streams of academic and applied literature that have historically contributed to the development of agile methods and IID, allowing a deeper view of past recent iterations of how these methods are commonly represented. We argue that although the roots of the currently popular approaches can be traced back to 1930s’, these have been mostly disassociated from present agile and IID practices due to a combination of barriers to transfer of knowledge such as divergent use of language and terminology between fields, attention decay, and the current industry-led narrative. Mapping and clarifying these historical links provides a useful perspective on contemporary project management practice and opens further possibilities for deeper research into agile project management methods.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
敏捷和迭代方法的起源
近年来,敏捷方法和迭代增量开发(IID)引起了人们的极大关注。它们被广泛应用于许多不同于其起源的制造业和信息系统开发行业。敏捷方法和IID是丰富的研究和实践流的一部分,这些研究和实践可以追溯到20世纪30年代,但是这些历史的大部分已经在最近关于这些方法的言论中丢失了。本文的目的是巩固对敏捷和IID形式的项目管理做出贡献的许多研究和实践流。本文提供了一个系统的文献综述,将学术和应用文献的碎片流连接起来,这些文献在历史上对敏捷方法和IID的开发做出了贡献,从而可以更深入地了解这些方法在过去最近的迭代中通常是如何表示的。我们认为,尽管目前流行的方法的根源可以追溯到20世纪30年代,但由于知识转移的障碍,例如不同领域之间语言和术语的不同使用,注意力衰减以及当前行业主导的叙述,这些方法大多与当前的敏捷和IID实践脱节。绘制和澄清这些历史联系为当代项目管理实践提供了一个有用的视角,并为更深入地研究敏捷项目管理方法开辟了进一步的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Project recovery: Project failures and how to get rid of them Agile Enhancement of Critical PMBoK v6 Processes Whole Life Program Success, Leadership Competencies and Motivation for Learning – UK Defence Case Project Resource Optimization Considering Labor Productivity Factors Service based framework of research projects in higher education institutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1