Трансформация Моделей Объяснения в Социальных Науках: Утопическое Воображение Как Ресурс Социологического Теоретизирования (Transformation Models of Explanation in the Social Sciences: The Utopian Imagination as a Resource for Sociological Theorizing)

V. Vakhshtayn, M. Erofeeva
{"title":"Трансформация Моделей Объяснения в Социальных Науках: Утопическое Воображение Как Ресурс Социологического Теоретизирования (Transformation Models of Explanation in the Social Sciences: The Utopian Imagination as a Resource for Sociological Theorizing)","authors":"V. Vakhshtayn, M. Erofeeva","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2665697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper analyzes the potential and development of explanatory concept of \"utopian imagination\", the distinction between epistemic and normative dimensions of utopia. We consider the research programs in which the negation of the principle of neutrality of the value qualifies as a utopian practice in the normative sense, the class of Utopias that build linkages between social order and human nature (anthropological utopia), as well as the connection between the utopian imagination and the actual sociological thinking style. Stand stable characteristics of the utopian imagination, which combine epistemic and normative measure utopia: criticism, imazhinativnost, Universalism, Constructivism, transcendentism, denial of everyday life. Implemented conceptualization of the concept of \"utopian imagination\" as a common element of competing models explaining the social order. Using the concept of heterotopia made case report - an example of the ethnographic museum. Based on the consideration of the possibility of everyday morality it demonstrates that people in the performance of their practical activities also rely on the resources of the imagination. Substantiates the existence of different types of everyday imagination.","PeriodicalId":106117,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Other Political Theory: Political Philosophy (Topic)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Other Political Theory: Political Philosophy (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2665697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper analyzes the potential and development of explanatory concept of "utopian imagination", the distinction between epistemic and normative dimensions of utopia. We consider the research programs in which the negation of the principle of neutrality of the value qualifies as a utopian practice in the normative sense, the class of Utopias that build linkages between social order and human nature (anthropological utopia), as well as the connection between the utopian imagination and the actual sociological thinking style. Stand stable characteristics of the utopian imagination, which combine epistemic and normative measure utopia: criticism, imazhinativnost, Universalism, Constructivism, transcendentism, denial of everyday life. Implemented conceptualization of the concept of "utopian imagination" as a common element of competing models explaining the social order. Using the concept of heterotopia made case report - an example of the ethnographic museum. Based on the consideration of the possibility of everyday morality it demonstrates that people in the performance of their practical activities also rely on the resources of the imagination. Substantiates the existence of different types of everyday imagination.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会科学解释模型的转变:乌托邦想象作为社会学理论的资源(社会科学解释模型)
本文分析了“乌托邦想象”解释性概念的潜力和发展,以及乌托邦的认知维度和规范维度的区别。我们考虑了对价值中立原则的否定在规范意义上被视为乌托邦实践的研究项目,在社会秩序和人性(人类学乌托邦)之间建立联系的乌托邦类别,以及乌托邦想象和实际社会学思维方式之间的联系。具有认识论与规范性相结合的乌托邦想象的稳定特征:批判主义、想象主义、普遍主义、建构主义、先验主义、对日常生活的否定。将“乌托邦想象”概念概念化,作为解释社会秩序的竞争性模型的共同要素。利用异托邦的概念做个案报告——以民族志博物馆为例。基于对日常道德可能性的考虑,论证了人们在实践活动的表现中也依赖于想象的资源。证实了不同类型的日常想象的存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evolution and Human Activity Reflections of a Physicist on the Cultural Ocean of His Time Living in the 'I' World Commerce Unbound: A Modern Promethean Story Academic Research: The Difficulty of Being Simple and Beautiful
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1