Knowledge management and the teaching of technical communication: where does knowledge reside in the theory vs. practice debate?

C. Johnson
{"title":"Knowledge management and the teaching of technical communication: where does knowledge reside in the theory vs. practice debate?","authors":"C. Johnson","doi":"10.1109/IPCC.2003.1245512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article looks at the current theory vs. practice debate in the teaching of technical communication from the viewpoint of knowledge management and transfer. Where does the most relevant knowledge reside and how best can it be communicated? In an attempt to answer this question, surveyed are eight articles from three journals, exploring the source of each and its position in relation to knowledge management. It is concluded that the workplace provides data, the academy provides information, but knowledge always resides in people. A secondary finding is that class issues still play a role in the techne vs. praxis debate. Theory has a higher status than practice and this disparity leads to exclusionary tactics that can limit knowledge generation and transfer, especially in regard to multicultural and multinational knowledge workers. A recommendation is that exclusionary practices should be avoided and language should be simplified in order to include the greatest possible number of participants in the knowledge-making process.","PeriodicalId":439913,"journal":{"name":"IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, 2003. IPCC 2003. Proceedings.","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, 2003. IPCC 2003. Proceedings.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.2003.1245512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article looks at the current theory vs. practice debate in the teaching of technical communication from the viewpoint of knowledge management and transfer. Where does the most relevant knowledge reside and how best can it be communicated? In an attempt to answer this question, surveyed are eight articles from three journals, exploring the source of each and its position in relation to knowledge management. It is concluded that the workplace provides data, the academy provides information, but knowledge always resides in people. A secondary finding is that class issues still play a role in the techne vs. praxis debate. Theory has a higher status than practice and this disparity leads to exclusionary tactics that can limit knowledge generation and transfer, especially in regard to multicultural and multinational knowledge workers. A recommendation is that exclusionary practices should be avoided and language should be simplified in order to include the greatest possible number of participants in the knowledge-making process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
知识管理与技术交流教学:理论与实践之争中的知识在哪里?
本文从知识管理和知识转移的角度审视了当前技术交流教学中理论与实践的争论。最相关的知识在哪里,如何才能最好地传播?为了回答这个问题,本文调查了来自三种期刊的八篇文章,探讨了它们的来源及其在知识管理中的地位。结论是,工作场所提供数据,学院提供信息,但知识永远存在于人身上。第二个发现是,阶级问题仍然在技术与实践的辩论中发挥作用。理论的地位高于实践,这种差异导致了排他性策略,这可能会限制知识的产生和转移,特别是对于多元文化和跨国知识工作者。一项建议是,应避免排他的做法,并应简化语言,以便使尽可能多的参与者参与知识的形成过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Retrieval of Internet information for task-specific use in environmental risk management Content management strategy and heuristic evaluation of a model electronic portfolio: a rhetorical approach A constructivist perspective on knowledge management Issues in globalizing a U.S. government Website Identifying learning difficulties based on email responses of technologically-impoverished users
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1