On the relative error of computing complex square roots in floating-point arithmetic

C. Jeannerod, J. Muller
{"title":"On the relative error of computing complex square roots in floating-point arithmetic","authors":"C. Jeannerod, J. Muller","doi":"10.1109/ACSSC.2017.8335442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study the accuracy of a classical approach to computing complex square-roots in floating-point arithmetic. Our analyses are done in binary floating-point arithmetic in precision p, and we assume that the (real) arithmetic operations +, —, x, ÷, √ are rounded to nearest, so the unit roundoff is u = 2−p. We show that in the absence of underflow and overflow, the componentwise and normwise relative errors of this approach are at most 7/2u and √37/2u, respectively, and this without having to neglect terms of higher order in u. We then provide some input examples showing that these bounds are reasonably sharp for the three basic binary interchange formats (binary32, binary64, and binary128) of the IEEE 754 standard for floating-point arithmetic.","PeriodicalId":296208,"journal":{"name":"2017 51st Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 51st Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACSSC.2017.8335442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We study the accuracy of a classical approach to computing complex square-roots in floating-point arithmetic. Our analyses are done in binary floating-point arithmetic in precision p, and we assume that the (real) arithmetic operations +, —, x, ÷, √ are rounded to nearest, so the unit roundoff is u = 2−p. We show that in the absence of underflow and overflow, the componentwise and normwise relative errors of this approach are at most 7/2u and √37/2u, respectively, and this without having to neglect terms of higher order in u. We then provide some input examples showing that these bounds are reasonably sharp for the three basic binary interchange formats (binary32, binary64, and binary128) of the IEEE 754 standard for floating-point arithmetic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
浮点运算中复数平方根计算的相对误差
我们研究了浮点运算中计算复数平方根的一种经典方法的精度。我们的分析是在精度p的二进制浮点运算中完成的,并且我们假设(实数)算术运算+,-,x, ÷,√被舍入到最接近,因此单位舍入为u = 2 -p。我们表明,在没有下流和溢出的情况下,这种方法的分量和正态相对误差分别最多为7/2u和√37/2u,而不必忽略u中的高阶项。然后,我们提供了一些输入示例,表明这些界限对于IEEE 754浮点运算标准的三种基本二进制交换格式(binary32, binary64和binary128)来说是相当尖锐的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
milliProxy: A TCP proxy architecture for 5G mmWave cellular systems Joint user scheduling and power optimization in full-duplex cells with successive interference cancellation Deep neural network architectures for modulation classification Towards provably invisible network flow fingerprints Seeded graph matching: Efficient algorithms and theoretical guarantees
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1