What for the future, from learning the past?

C. Neill, R. Bell, M. Belgrave, Peter Meihana, Geoff Watson
{"title":"What for the future, from learning the past?","authors":"C. Neill, R. Bell, M. Belgrave, Peter Meihana, Geoff Watson","doi":"10.26686/nzaroe.v27.8029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Important curriculum development work has progressed since the 2019 announcement that Aotearoa New Zealand histories would become compulsory learning across all schools. Much effort has gone into considering how learning ‘our’ histories can engage, inspire and empower children in schools through years 1 to 10, and recent writing has focused on how to address challenges in building knowledge and capability to meet those aims. However, what will be the effects beyond those years? Will students still be drawn to choose history in their senior school years, or will they be ‘over it’? In a quest to gauge the implications of the new curriculum, our research team surveyed secondary school history students on their motivations and areas of interest in learning history, and their views on Aotearoa New Zealand history becoming compulsory for Years 1-10. \nFindings from our research confirmed that students’ past engagement with history influenced their ongoing interest, motivation and understanding of the subject. However, the positive learning that had drawn them to history was often about everyone else’s history rather than their own. Students identified international histories – often involving war or conflict – as favourite topics. So, while most supported the implementation of the new curriculum, they equally expressed concern that the local focus should not be at the expense of wider perspectives. They felt history could become repetitive and boring; elements which could put students off engaging with history in future.  We conclude by presenting important considerations for ensuring such negative impacts do not occur.","PeriodicalId":377372,"journal":{"name":"The New Zealand Annual Review of Education","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The New Zealand Annual Review of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26686/nzaroe.v27.8029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Important curriculum development work has progressed since the 2019 announcement that Aotearoa New Zealand histories would become compulsory learning across all schools. Much effort has gone into considering how learning ‘our’ histories can engage, inspire and empower children in schools through years 1 to 10, and recent writing has focused on how to address challenges in building knowledge and capability to meet those aims. However, what will be the effects beyond those years? Will students still be drawn to choose history in their senior school years, or will they be ‘over it’? In a quest to gauge the implications of the new curriculum, our research team surveyed secondary school history students on their motivations and areas of interest in learning history, and their views on Aotearoa New Zealand history becoming compulsory for Years 1-10. Findings from our research confirmed that students’ past engagement with history influenced their ongoing interest, motivation and understanding of the subject. However, the positive learning that had drawn them to history was often about everyone else’s history rather than their own. Students identified international histories – often involving war or conflict – as favourite topics. So, while most supported the implementation of the new curriculum, they equally expressed concern that the local focus should not be at the expense of wider perspectives. They felt history could become repetitive and boring; elements which could put students off engaging with history in future.  We conclude by presenting important considerations for ensuring such negative impacts do not occur.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从过去吸取教训,将来怎么办?
自2019年宣布新西兰历史将成为所有学校的必修课程以来,重要的课程开发工作取得了进展。很多人都在努力思考,学习“我们的”历史如何能吸引、激励和赋予学校一到十年级的孩子力量,最近的文章主要关注如何应对在建立知识和能力方面的挑战,以实现这些目标。然而,这些年后会有什么影响呢?学生们在高中阶段是否还会被历史课所吸引,或者他们是否会“放弃”历史课?为了评估新课程的影响,我们的研究团队调查了中学历史学生学习历史的动机和兴趣领域,以及他们对新西兰历史成为1-10年级必修课程的看法。我们的研究结果证实,学生过去与历史的接触影响了他们对这门学科的持续兴趣、动机和理解。然而,吸引他们学习历史的正面知识往往是关于其他人的历史,而不是他们自己的历史。学生们认为国际历史——通常涉及战争或冲突——是他们最喜欢的话题。因此,虽然大多数人支持实施新课程,但他们同样表示担心,不应以牺牲更广泛的视野为代价,只关注地方。他们觉得历史会变得重复和无聊;这些因素可能会让学生们在未来放弃学习历史。最后,我们提出了确保此类负面影响不会发生的重要考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What will it take? Knowledgeable and qualified early childhood teachers: Tensions, constraints, and possibilities Transformative shifts in early childhood education systems after four decades of neoliberalism Leading education into the future What we can do to realise our excellence and equity goals in literacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1