Science Policy Through a Local Lens: The Role of State-Level Advisory Groups in the 21st Century

Caroline Schuerger, Danielle DaCrema, Matthew Diasio, Ryan B. Dudek, Coleman Harris, Meredith N. Schmehl, Melody Tan
{"title":"Science Policy Through a Local Lens: The Role of State-Level Advisory Groups in the 21st Century","authors":"Caroline Schuerger, Danielle DaCrema, Matthew Diasio, Ryan B. Dudek, Coleman Harris, Meredith N. Schmehl, Melody Tan","doi":"10.38126/jspg200107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As new challenges arise in the 21st century, state and local governments play an increasingly critical role in science policy, contrasting the traditional focus on the federal government in this landscape. To meet these challenges, states require access to subject area expertise and evidence-based advisory resources as part of their policy toolkits. Many states have independent academies of science that have potential to provide scientific expertise to state governments. However, steps need to be taken to capitalize on these resources and integrate them with other key elements in the policymaking process. By prioritizing the development of relationships with state and local governments, academies of science and other state-level scientific entities could improve the utility of their advisory resources. We present case studies from Connecticut and Missouri, where such a model has allowed scientists to contribute to policymaking on state-level issues. We further discuss the benefits and limitations of this advisory model and explain how this approach can benefit states with different political compositions and legislative structures. By partnering more intentionally with state and local governments, academies of science can make more effective contributions to address the growing science policy issues of the 21st century and beyond.","PeriodicalId":222224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Science Policy & Governance","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Science Policy & Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38126/jspg200107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As new challenges arise in the 21st century, state and local governments play an increasingly critical role in science policy, contrasting the traditional focus on the federal government in this landscape. To meet these challenges, states require access to subject area expertise and evidence-based advisory resources as part of their policy toolkits. Many states have independent academies of science that have potential to provide scientific expertise to state governments. However, steps need to be taken to capitalize on these resources and integrate them with other key elements in the policymaking process. By prioritizing the development of relationships with state and local governments, academies of science and other state-level scientific entities could improve the utility of their advisory resources. We present case studies from Connecticut and Missouri, where such a model has allowed scientists to contribute to policymaking on state-level issues. We further discuss the benefits and limitations of this advisory model and explain how this approach can benefit states with different political compositions and legislative structures. By partnering more intentionally with state and local governments, academies of science can make more effective contributions to address the growing science policy issues of the 21st century and beyond.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地方视角下的科学政策:21世纪国家级咨询小组的作用
随着21世纪新挑战的出现,州和地方政府在科学政策中发挥着越来越重要的作用,这与传统上对联邦政府的关注形成了鲜明对比。为了应对这些挑战,各国需要获得学科领域的专业知识和循证咨询资源,作为其政策工具包的一部分。许多州都有独立的科学院,有可能为州政府提供科学专业知识。但是,需要采取步骤利用这些资源,并将其与决策过程中的其他关键因素结合起来。通过优先发展与州和地方政府的关系,科学院和其他国家级科学实体可以提高其咨询资源的效用。我们介绍了康涅狄格州和密苏里州的案例研究,在那里,这样的模型允许科学家为州一级问题的决策做出贡献。我们进一步讨论了这种咨询模式的好处和局限性,并解释了这种方法如何使具有不同政治组成和立法结构的国家受益。通过更有意地与州和地方政府合作,科学院可以为解决21世纪及以后日益增长的科学政策问题做出更有效的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cover Memo: Volume 23, Issue 2, Special Issue on Civic Science for Transformative Policy Solutions to Societal Challenges Left out of the Room Where it Happens: Barriers to Serving in Senior Congressional Staff Roles May Limit “Representative” Science Policymaking Community-Driven Civic Science: Relationship Building to Prioritize Public Needs Rethinking Civic Science Funding to Better Support Community Engagement From Intent to Impact: Enabling Transdisciplinary Research for Responsible Scientific Stewardship
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1