“ITALIAN JOURNEY” BY J. W. GOETHE: BETWEEN WINCKELMANN AND HEGEL

Borys Shalahinov
{"title":"“ITALIAN JOURNEY” BY J. W. GOETHE: BETWEEN WINCKELMANN AND HEGEL","authors":"Borys Shalahinov","doi":"10.33608/0236-1477.2022.06.69-86","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The text of the “Italian journey” analyzes the main objects of Goethe’s attention from the point of view of aesthetic systematization: natural phenomena (sea, mountains, vegetation, volcanoes), geological and botanical features of the area, various results of human activity and human behavior, abandoned and dilapidated architectural monuments of antiquity, ‘unconventional’ personalities. Panoramic contemplation of the area is seen as the main way of the author’s observations and the development of a specific worldview, which includes an attempt not only to separately consider the contradictory diversity of phenomena but also to harmonize it esthetically. Artistic allusions serve as one of the ways of such harmonization. \nThe behavior of the human crowd and traces of human activity are presented by the author in the same stream with the natural phenomena of nature. As to the cultural assessment of modern Italians, the author describes them as happy, naive, simple-minded, and carefree but indifferent to the requirements of modern civilization and the cultural achievements of their ancestors. Aesthetically, the poet-observer relies on Winkelmann’s artistic postulate of “noble simplicity and calm greatness” and tries to reveal the contradictions of this system in terms of the aesthetics of the emerging new age. However, in general, Goethe’s aesthetics remains within the framework of the eighteenth century and includes universal concepts of contemporary art: integrity, harmony, revitalization, diversity, balance, and others. Therefore, the terminological apparatus and range of concepts tend not to Hegel (heroic, dramatic, lyrical, comic, etc.) but rather to the previous era.","PeriodicalId":370928,"journal":{"name":"Слово і Час","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Слово і Час","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33608/0236-1477.2022.06.69-86","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The text of the “Italian journey” analyzes the main objects of Goethe’s attention from the point of view of aesthetic systematization: natural phenomena (sea, mountains, vegetation, volcanoes), geological and botanical features of the area, various results of human activity and human behavior, abandoned and dilapidated architectural monuments of antiquity, ‘unconventional’ personalities. Panoramic contemplation of the area is seen as the main way of the author’s observations and the development of a specific worldview, which includes an attempt not only to separately consider the contradictory diversity of phenomena but also to harmonize it esthetically. Artistic allusions serve as one of the ways of such harmonization. The behavior of the human crowd and traces of human activity are presented by the author in the same stream with the natural phenomena of nature. As to the cultural assessment of modern Italians, the author describes them as happy, naive, simple-minded, and carefree but indifferent to the requirements of modern civilization and the cultural achievements of their ancestors. Aesthetically, the poet-observer relies on Winkelmann’s artistic postulate of “noble simplicity and calm greatness” and tries to reveal the contradictions of this system in terms of the aesthetics of the emerging new age. However, in general, Goethe’s aesthetics remains within the framework of the eighteenth century and includes universal concepts of contemporary art: integrity, harmony, revitalization, diversity, balance, and others. Therefore, the terminological apparatus and range of concepts tend not to Hegel (heroic, dramatic, lyrical, comic, etc.) but rather to the previous era.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
歌德的《意大利之旅》:温克尔曼与黑格尔之间
《意大利之旅》的文本从美学系统化的角度分析了歌德关注的主要对象:自然现象(海洋、山脉、植被、火山)、该地区的地质和植物特征、人类活动和人类行为的各种结果、被遗弃和破败的古代建筑纪念碑、“非常规”的个性。对该地区的全景观照被视为作者观察和发展特定世界观的主要方式,其中包括既要单独考虑矛盾的多样性现象,又要在美学上协调它们的尝试。艺术典故是这种和谐的方式之一。作者将人群的行为和人类活动的痕迹与自然界的自然现象放在同一流中呈现。对于现代意大利人的文化评价,作者将他们描述为快乐、天真、单纯、无忧无虑,但对现代文明的要求和祖先的文化成就漠不关心。在美学上,诗人-观察者依靠温克尔曼“高贵的简单和冷静的伟大”的艺术假设,并试图从新时代的美学角度揭示这一体系的矛盾。然而,总的来说,歌德的美学仍然停留在18世纪的框架内,包括当代艺术的普遍概念:完整、和谐、振兴、多样性、平衡等。因此,术语工具和概念范围不倾向于黑格尔(英雄、戏剧、抒情、喜剧等),而是倾向于前一个时代。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
OLD UKRAINIAN MYTHOLOGY IN OLEH OLZHYCH’S LYRICS DUBIA TEXTS IN THE ACADEMIC EDITION OF TARAS SHEVCHENKO’S WORKS: THE PROBLEM OF AUTHORSHIP ROMA AS A MATRIX OF THE ‘OTHER’IN THE PROJECTION OF ORIENTALISM, RACE, AND NATION IN THE WORKS BY OLHA KOBYLIANSKA THE MYTHOLOGICAL SPACE OF GOOD AND EVIL IN “THE YELLOW PRINCE” BY VASYL BARKA JENS PETER JAKOBSEN'S NOVELLA “MOGENS” TRANSLATED BY OLHA KOBYLIANSKA: TEXT AND CONTEXTS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1