{"title":"The Economics of Scientific Misconduct","authors":"J. Wible","doi":"10.4324/9781003009252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Economics of Scientific Misconduct explores episodes of misconduct in the natural and biomedical sciences and replication failure in economics and psychology over the past half-century. Here scientific misconduct is considered from the perspective of a single discipline such as economics likely for the first time in intellectual history. Research misconduct has become an important concern across many natural, medical, and social sciences, including economics, over the past half-century. Initially, a mainstream economic approach to science and scientific misconduct draws from conventional microeconomics and the theories of Becker, Ehrlich, and C. S. Peirce's \"economy of research.” Then the works of Peirce and Thorstein Veblen from the 19th century point toward contemporary debates over statistical inference in econometrics and the failure of recent macroeconomic models. In more contemporary economics, clashes regarding discrimination and harassment have led to a Code of Professional Conduct from the American Economic Association and a Code of Ethics from one of its members. The last chapter considers research ethics matters related to the COVID-19 pandemic. There has been an explosion of research and some retractions. More generally, a concern with research ethics contributes to scientific progress by making some of its most difficult problems more transparent and understandable and thus possibly more surmountable. This book offers valuable insights for students and scholars of research ethics across the sciences, philosophy of science and social science, and economic theory. © 2023 James R. Wible.","PeriodicalId":402271,"journal":{"name":"The Economics of Scientifc Misconduct: Fraud, Replication Failure, and Research Ethics in Empirical Inquiry","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Economics of Scientifc Misconduct: Fraud, Replication Failure, and Research Ethics in Empirical Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003009252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
科学不端行为的经济学
《科学不端行为的经济学》探讨了过去半个世纪自然科学和生物医学科学中的不端行为,以及经济学和心理学的复制失败。在这里,科学不端行为是从单一学科的角度来考虑的,比如经济学,这可能是思想史上第一次。在过去的半个世纪里,研究不端行为已经成为包括经济学在内的许多自然、医学和社会科学领域的一个重要问题。最初,主流经济学研究科学和科学不端行为的方法来自传统的微观经济学以及贝克尔、埃利希和皮尔斯的“研究经济”理论。然后,皮尔斯和托斯坦·凡勃伦(Thorstein Veblen)从19世纪开始的著作指向了当代关于计量经济学统计推断和近期宏观经济模型失败的争论。在更现代的经济学中,关于歧视和骚扰的冲突导致美国经济协会(American Economic Association)制定了《职业行为准则》(Code of Professional Conduct),该协会的一名成员制定了《道德准则》(Code of Ethics)。最后一章讨论了与COVID-19大流行相关的研究伦理问题。有大量的研究和一些撤回。更普遍地说,对研究伦理的关注有助于科学进步,因为它使一些最困难的问题变得更加透明和容易理解,从而可能更容易克服。这本书提供了宝贵的见解,学生和学者的研究伦理跨越科学,科学哲学和社会科学,经济理论。©2023 James R. Wible。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。