Authority and Commitment: Why Universities, Like Legislatures, are Not Organized as Firms

S. Masten
{"title":"Authority and Commitment: Why Universities, Like Legislatures, are Not Organized as Firms","authors":"S. Masten","doi":"10.1111/j.1530-9134.2006.00113.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"This paper explores the functions and limitations of democratic governance by analyzing the allocation of decision-making authority in colleges and universities. Contrary to the conventional perception that large numbers and heterogeneity of voters and issues undermine the efficiency of democratic decision making, data on the allocation of authority for thirty-one decision areas in 826 US colleges and universities show democratic governance to be more prevalent in larger, \"full-service\" research universities than in smaller liberal arts colleges and special-curriculum institutions. State- and church-affiliated institutions, meanwhile, tend to be governed more like firms. The results overall are consistent with economic theories of political organization that view democratic governance primarily as a means of enhancing the credibility of commitments rather than as a method of aggregating preferences.\" Copyright 2006, The Author(s) Journal Compilation (c) 2006 Blackwell Publishing.","PeriodicalId":248832,"journal":{"name":"Wiley-Blackwell: Journal of Economics & Management Strategy","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiley-Blackwell: Journal of Economics & Management Strategy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2006.00113.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

"This paper explores the functions and limitations of democratic governance by analyzing the allocation of decision-making authority in colleges and universities. Contrary to the conventional perception that large numbers and heterogeneity of voters and issues undermine the efficiency of democratic decision making, data on the allocation of authority for thirty-one decision areas in 826 US colleges and universities show democratic governance to be more prevalent in larger, "full-service" research universities than in smaller liberal arts colleges and special-curriculum institutions. State- and church-affiliated institutions, meanwhile, tend to be governed more like firms. The results overall are consistent with economic theories of political organization that view democratic governance primarily as a means of enhancing the credibility of commitments rather than as a method of aggregating preferences." Copyright 2006, The Author(s) Journal Compilation (c) 2006 Blackwell Publishing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
权威与承诺:为什么大学不像立法机构那样组织成公司
本文通过对高校决策权配置的分析,探讨了民主治理的功能与局限性。与传统观念相反,大量的选民和问题的异质性破坏了民主决策的效率,对826所美国高校的31个决策领域的权力分配的数据表明,民主治理在较大的、“全方位服务”的研究型大学中比在较小的文理学院和特殊课程机构中更为普遍。与此同时,国家和教会附属机构往往更像公司一样被管理。总体而言,结果与政治组织的经济理论一致,这些理论认为民主治理主要是提高承诺可信度的一种手段,而不是汇总偏好的一种方法。”版权所有2006,作者(s)期刊汇编(c) 2006布莱克威尔出版社。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dynamic Incentive Effects of Assignment Mechanisms: Experimental Evidence On Some Procedures of Forming a Multipartner Alliance Observable Contracts as Commitments: Interdependent Contracts and Moral Hazard The Ignored Performance Measure Possibly-Final Offers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1