Systematic Review of the published Explainable Educational Recommendation Systems

Ivica Pesovski, A. Bogdanova, V. Trajkovik
{"title":"Systematic Review of the published Explainable Educational Recommendation Systems","authors":"Ivica Pesovski, A. Bogdanova, V. Trajkovik","doi":"10.1109/ITHET56107.2022.10032029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The goal of this paper is to systematically review the available literature on the topic of explainable recommendation systems in education, especially when recommendation systems are integrated as a part of learning management systems (LMS). The focus years for analyzing available literature are the years between 2010 and 2022, period when online learning is expanding and online learning platforms are continuously being developed, which makes these years relevant for scoping this review. The topic of interest in this research are recommendation algorithms whose results can be explained and interpreted. The first part of the methodology used in the paper utilizes an NLP-powered toolkit that automates a big part of the review process by automatically analyzing articles indexed in the IEEE Xplore, PubMed, Springer, Elsevier and MDPI digital libraries. The toolkit relies on the PRISMA methodology for standardizing systematic reviews. First, a quantitative analysis of all available literature is performed, followed by a qualitative analysis of the few selected articles which indeed focus on the explainability when implementing recommendation systems in educational context. The relevant articles are analyzed in detail and compared on multiple indicators like the field of work, tools and techniques used, and how explainability is achieved. The results show that although the amount of available research is growing and new learning management systems are being developed at a fast pace in the last few years, the explainability of the machine learning techniques used in the recommendation systems is not a popular topic among the researchers and developers with research interest in educational context. The amount of the available literature for explainable recommendation systems in educational environment is scarce, but is expected to grow following the global trend of explainable artificial intelligence $(\\mathrm{x}\\mathrm{A}\\mathrm{I})$ as key technique for practical implementation of advanced AI models.","PeriodicalId":125795,"journal":{"name":"2022 20th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 20th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITHET56107.2022.10032029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to systematically review the available literature on the topic of explainable recommendation systems in education, especially when recommendation systems are integrated as a part of learning management systems (LMS). The focus years for analyzing available literature are the years between 2010 and 2022, period when online learning is expanding and online learning platforms are continuously being developed, which makes these years relevant for scoping this review. The topic of interest in this research are recommendation algorithms whose results can be explained and interpreted. The first part of the methodology used in the paper utilizes an NLP-powered toolkit that automates a big part of the review process by automatically analyzing articles indexed in the IEEE Xplore, PubMed, Springer, Elsevier and MDPI digital libraries. The toolkit relies on the PRISMA methodology for standardizing systematic reviews. First, a quantitative analysis of all available literature is performed, followed by a qualitative analysis of the few selected articles which indeed focus on the explainability when implementing recommendation systems in educational context. The relevant articles are analyzed in detail and compared on multiple indicators like the field of work, tools and techniques used, and how explainability is achieved. The results show that although the amount of available research is growing and new learning management systems are being developed at a fast pace in the last few years, the explainability of the machine learning techniques used in the recommendation systems is not a popular topic among the researchers and developers with research interest in educational context. The amount of the available literature for explainable recommendation systems in educational environment is scarce, but is expected to grow following the global trend of explainable artificial intelligence $(\mathrm{x}\mathrm{A}\mathrm{I})$ as key technique for practical implementation of advanced AI models.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对已发表的可解释教育推荐系统的系统评价
本文的目的是系统地回顾现有的关于教育中可解释推荐系统的文献,特别是当推荐系统被集成为学习管理系统(LMS)的一部分时。分析现有文献的重点年份是2010年至2022年,这一时期在线学习正在扩大,在线学习平台正在不断发展,这使得这些年份与本综述的范围相关。本研究感兴趣的主题是推荐算法,其结果可以被解释和解释。论文中使用的方法的第一部分利用了一个nlp驱动的工具包,通过自动分析在IEEE Xplore、PubMed、Springer、Elsevier和MDPI数字图书馆中索引的文章,使审查过程的大部分自动化。该工具包依赖于PRISMA方法来标准化系统审查。首先,对所有可用文献进行定量分析,然后对少数选定的文章进行定性分析,这些文章确实侧重于在教育背景下实施推荐系统时的可解释性。对相关文章进行了详细的分析,并在工作领域、使用的工具和技术以及如何实现可解释性等多个指标上进行了比较。结果表明,尽管在过去几年中,可用的研究数量正在增长,新的学习管理系统正在快速开发,但推荐系统中使用的机器学习技术的可解释性并不是研究人员和开发人员对教育背景研究感兴趣的热门话题。教育环境中可解释推荐系统的可用文献数量很少,但随着可解释人工智能$(\ mathm {x}\ mathm {A}\ mathm {I})$作为高级人工智能模型实际实施的关键技术的全球趋势,预计将会增长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using Learning Analytics to Explore the Role of Self-regulation in students’ Achievements in Synchronous Online Learning Higher education strategy in engineering to meet global technical challenges Intelligent Bandwidth Planner Enhancing Learning Technologies in Constrained Distance Learning Environments – a Pandemic Response Interdisciplinary Cyber Training A New Era of Plagiarism the Danger of Cheating Using AI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1