Oxidative Coupling of Methane

H. Godini, M. M. Bhasin, F. Gallucci
{"title":"Oxidative Coupling of Methane","authors":"H. Godini, M. M. Bhasin, F. Gallucci","doi":"10.1201/9780429022852-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A quantitative comparison of the performance of the most common reactor con fi gurations proposed for the oxidative coupling of methane (OCM) is made on the basis of numerical calculations with phenomenological reactor models. The con fi gurations that are analyzed can be divided into two main categories, namely, packed-bed reactors (including conventional packed beds with external cooling, packed-bed membrane reactors, and adiabatic packed beds with post cracking) and fl uidized bed reactors (bubbling fl uidized bed reactor, circulating fl uidized bed reactor, and fl uidized bed membrane reactor). The challenges in both con-fi guration types, mainly the heat management in the case of the packed-bed reactors and the low C 2 þ yields obtained in fl uidized bed reactors, are evaluated and quanti fi ed. To ensure a fair comparison, La 2 O 3 /CaO is chosen as the OCM catalyst for all the considered cases, mainly in view of the availability of a comprehensive kinetics model. The results show that, with conventional con fi gu-rations, it is not possible to achieve high C 2 þ yields that are needed to make the process economically viable. However, the results also indicate that the C 2 þ yield can be signi fi cantly improved by feeding the oxygen distributively along the reactor axial length.","PeriodicalId":232314,"journal":{"name":"Direct Natural Gas Conversion to Value-Added Chemicals","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Direct Natural Gas Conversion to Value-Added Chemicals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429022852-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A quantitative comparison of the performance of the most common reactor con fi gurations proposed for the oxidative coupling of methane (OCM) is made on the basis of numerical calculations with phenomenological reactor models. The con fi gurations that are analyzed can be divided into two main categories, namely, packed-bed reactors (including conventional packed beds with external cooling, packed-bed membrane reactors, and adiabatic packed beds with post cracking) and fl uidized bed reactors (bubbling fl uidized bed reactor, circulating fl uidized bed reactor, and fl uidized bed membrane reactor). The challenges in both con-fi guration types, mainly the heat management in the case of the packed-bed reactors and the low C 2 þ yields obtained in fl uidized bed reactors, are evaluated and quanti fi ed. To ensure a fair comparison, La 2 O 3 /CaO is chosen as the OCM catalyst for all the considered cases, mainly in view of the availability of a comprehensive kinetics model. The results show that, with conventional con fi gu-rations, it is not possible to achieve high C 2 þ yields that are needed to make the process economically viable. However, the results also indicate that the C 2 þ yield can be signi fi cantly improved by feeding the oxygen distributively along the reactor axial length.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甲烷的氧化偶联
在用现象反应器模型进行数值计算的基础上,对几种常用的甲烷氧化偶联反应器构型的性能进行了定量比较。所分析的构型主要分为两大类,即填料床反应器(包括常规外冷填料床、填料床膜反应器和后裂解绝热填料床)和流化床反应器(鼓泡式流化床反应器、循环流化床反应器和流化床膜反应器)。对两种构型类型的挑战进行了评估和定量分析,主要是填料床反应器的热管理和流化床反应器的低c2 þ产率。为了确保公平的比较,主要考虑到综合动力学模型的可用性,在所有考虑的情况下,选择la2o3 /CaO作为OCM催化剂。结果表明,使用传统的配置,不可能达到使该过程在经济上可行所需的高二氧化碳产量。然而,结果也表明,沿反应器轴向分布供氧可以显著提高c2 þ产率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Oxidative Coupling of Methane
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1