EFEKTIFITAS MEDIASI DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SENGKETA PERCERAIAN (STUDY DI PENGADILAN AGAMA BUKITTINGGI DAN PENGADILAN AGAMA PAYAKUMBUH TAHUN 2015-2017)

R. Fauzi, F. Faisal
{"title":"EFEKTIFITAS MEDIASI DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SENGKETA PERCERAIAN (STUDY DI PENGADILAN AGAMA BUKITTINGGI DAN PENGADILAN AGAMA PAYAKUMBUH TAHUN 2015-2017)","authors":"R. Fauzi, F. Faisal","doi":"10.22216/soumlaw.v1i2.3722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research was conducted to reveal the Effectiveness of Mediation in Resolving Divorce Disputes in the Religious Courts. The purpose of this study is to describe the application and success rate of mediation in divorce cases in accordance with PERMA No.1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures. As well as explaining the factors that are obstacles and driving the application of mediation as an effort to reduce the rate of divorce against divorce cases in the Religious Courts. So that the problems faced in the divorce dispute can be resolved through mediation by referring to PERMA No. 1 of 2016. This research will be conducted in the Bukittinggi Religious Court and Payakumbuh Religious Court, Case of 2015-2017. The approach used in this research is a sociological juridical approach which is a research based on a legal provision and a phenomenon or event that occurs in the field. The method used in analyzing data is using qualitative analysis methods. The conclusion of this study is the application of mediation in divorce cases in the Religion Court of the Bukittinggi Religion Court and the Payakumbuh Religious Court have not been effective because they are not in accordance with the intention of the issuance of the Supreme Court Regulation on Mediation Procedures in court. The success rate of mediation in the Bukittinggi Religious Court and Payakumbuh Religious Courts in 2015, 2016 and 2017 is very low, as evidenced by the number of cases that succeeded in mediating ± 5%. Supporting factors for the success of mediation: the ability of mediators, sociological and psychological, moral and spiritual factors and the good will of the parties. While the inhibiting factors for the success of mediation are as follows: the strong desire of the parties to divorce, prolonged conflict and economic factors.","PeriodicalId":200615,"journal":{"name":"Soumatera Law Review","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soumatera Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22216/soumlaw.v1i2.3722","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This research was conducted to reveal the Effectiveness of Mediation in Resolving Divorce Disputes in the Religious Courts. The purpose of this study is to describe the application and success rate of mediation in divorce cases in accordance with PERMA No.1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures. As well as explaining the factors that are obstacles and driving the application of mediation as an effort to reduce the rate of divorce against divorce cases in the Religious Courts. So that the problems faced in the divorce dispute can be resolved through mediation by referring to PERMA No. 1 of 2016. This research will be conducted in the Bukittinggi Religious Court and Payakumbuh Religious Court, Case of 2015-2017. The approach used in this research is a sociological juridical approach which is a research based on a legal provision and a phenomenon or event that occurs in the field. The method used in analyzing data is using qualitative analysis methods. The conclusion of this study is the application of mediation in divorce cases in the Religion Court of the Bukittinggi Religion Court and the Payakumbuh Religious Court have not been effective because they are not in accordance with the intention of the issuance of the Supreme Court Regulation on Mediation Procedures in court. The success rate of mediation in the Bukittinggi Religious Court and Payakumbuh Religious Courts in 2015, 2016 and 2017 is very low, as evidenced by the number of cases that succeeded in mediating ± 5%. Supporting factors for the success of mediation: the ability of mediators, sociological and psychological, moral and spiritual factors and the good will of the parties. While the inhibiting factors for the success of mediation are as follows: the strong desire of the parties to divorce, prolonged conflict and economic factors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
仲裁解决离婚问题的有效方法(2017年至2017年武吉布宗教法庭和帕库布布宗教法庭研究)
本研究旨在揭示宗教法院调解离婚纠纷的有效性。本研究的目的是描述根据PERMA 2016年第1号《调解程序》在离婚案件中调解的应用和成功率。以及解释障碍的因素和推动调解的应用,以努力降低离婚率对离婚案件在宗教法院。以便在离婚纠纷中遇到的问题可以参照PERMA 2016第1号进行调解解决。本研究将在Bukittinggi宗教法院和Payakumbuh宗教法院2015-2017年的案例中进行。本研究使用的方法是社会学法学方法,即基于法律规定和该领域发生的现象或事件进行研究。分析数据的方法是采用定性分析方法。本研究的结论是,在Bukittinggi宗教法院和Payakumbuh宗教法院的离婚案件中,调解的应用并没有产生效果,因为它们不符合《最高法院关于法庭调解程序的规定》颁布的意图。2015年、2016年和2017年,武吉丁吉宗教法院和巴雅昆布宗教法院的调解成功率很低,调解成功率为±5%。调解成功的支持因素:调解员的能力、社会和心理因素、道德和精神因素以及当事人的善意。而调解成功的制约因素有:当事人强烈的离婚意愿、长期的冲突和经济因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PENERAPAN SANKSI PIDANA DENDA TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PENYALAHGUNAAN DAN PEREDARAN GELAP NARKOTIKA DI PENGADILAN NEGERI PADANG PERKEMBANGAN KEBIJAKAN DAERAH SEBAGAI PARADIGMA DASAR UNTUK PENENTUAN KEBIJAKAN MENGELOLA POTENSI KEBERAGAMAN TANGGUNG JAWAB DIREKSI TERHADAP TERJADINYA KREDIT MACET PADA PERBANKAN BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 40 TAHUN 2007 PENDAFTARAN TANAH DAN PENERBITAN SERTIPIKAT DALAM PERSPEKTIF FREE TRADE ZONE (FTZ) DI KAMPUNG TUA, KOTA BATAM, PROVINSI KEPULAUAN RIAU PEMBUATAN AKTA PERDAMAIAN DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA TANAH ULAYAT MELALUI NOTARIS DIKABUPATEN AGAM
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1