Actions Speak Louder Than Words: A Linguistic Analysis of Corporate Environmental Sustainability Disclosures

Andy Moniz
{"title":"Actions Speak Louder Than Words: A Linguistic Analysis of Corporate Environmental Sustainability Disclosures","authors":"Andy Moniz","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2802739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study evaluates the extent to which firms acknowledge climate change and communicate credible climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies in their environmental sustainability reports. We assess the credibility of firms' strategies by retrieving domain knowledge using Linked Data from the Web. Specifically, we query an online government database and retrieve earth scientists' recommendations on climate change. Using these recommendations, we employ a probabilistic topic model to create a taxonomy of climate change terms. We then evaluate the extent to which firms discuss these recommendations in their environmental sustainability communications. Our findings suggest that the probability that a firm reduces its direct greenhouse gas emissions is positively related to whether its strategy is aligned with earth scientists' recommendations. Our approach is intended to highlight the merits of integrating earth science domain knowledge into a corporate disclosure analysis, and may be of interest to regulators seeking to detect corporate 'greenwashing.'","PeriodicalId":176183,"journal":{"name":"AARN: Energy & Climate Change (Sub-Topic)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AARN: Energy & Climate Change (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2802739","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluates the extent to which firms acknowledge climate change and communicate credible climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies in their environmental sustainability reports. We assess the credibility of firms' strategies by retrieving domain knowledge using Linked Data from the Web. Specifically, we query an online government database and retrieve earth scientists' recommendations on climate change. Using these recommendations, we employ a probabilistic topic model to create a taxonomy of climate change terms. We then evaluate the extent to which firms discuss these recommendations in their environmental sustainability communications. Our findings suggest that the probability that a firm reduces its direct greenhouse gas emissions is positively related to whether its strategy is aligned with earth scientists' recommendations. Our approach is intended to highlight the merits of integrating earth science domain knowledge into a corporate disclosure analysis, and may be of interest to regulators seeking to detect corporate 'greenwashing.'
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
行动胜于雄辩:对企业环境可持续性披露的语言分析
本研究评估了企业在其环境可持续性报告中承认气候变化并传达可信的气候变化减缓和适应战略的程度。我们通过使用网络关联数据检索领域知识来评估公司战略的可信度。具体来说,我们查询一个在线政府数据库,检索地球科学家关于气候变化的建议。使用这些建议,我们使用概率主题模型来创建气候变化术语的分类法。然后,我们评估公司在其环境可持续性沟通中讨论这些建议的程度。我们的研究结果表明,企业减少直接温室气体排放的可能性与其战略是否符合地球科学家的建议呈正相关。我们的方法旨在强调将地球科学领域知识整合到企业披露分析中的优点,并且可能会引起寻求发现企业“洗绿”的监管机构的兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Limit Pricing and Entry Game of Renewable Energy Firms into the Energy Sector Extreme Weather and Ratings on Corporate Climate Mitigation Policies Analysis of International Funding for Haiti’s Climate Change Priorities Analysis of Farmers’ Vulnerability to Climate Change in Niger State, Nigeria Eco-Cement with Low Carbon Dioxide Emission and Less Operation Energy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1