Empirical evaluation of research prototypes at variable stages of maturity

O. Badreddin
{"title":"Empirical evaluation of research prototypes at variable stages of maturity","authors":"O. Badreddin","doi":"10.1109/USER.2013.6603076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Empirical evaluation of research tools is growing especially in the field of software engineering. A number of research techniques have been proposed and used in evaluating research prototypes. We take the view that evaluation of software engineering tools is best achieved in industrial settings, with real life artifacts and tasks, and with professional software engineers. However, the feasibility of such evaluation is limited for many reasons. Some challenges are related to the prototypes under study, others are related to the industrial environments where the need to meet business requirements take precedence on experimenting with new tools and techniques. In this paper, we summarize our experiences in evaluating a research prototype tool using a grounded theory study, a questionnaire, and a controlled experiment. We discuss the challenges that hindered our industrial evaluation and share ideas on how to overcome these challenges. We propose an action research study where the research tool is used by a small number of experienced professionals in an industrial project.","PeriodicalId":319590,"journal":{"name":"2013 2nd International Workshop on User Evaluations for Software Engineering Researchers (USER)","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 2nd International Workshop on User Evaluations for Software Engineering Researchers (USER)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/USER.2013.6603076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Empirical evaluation of research tools is growing especially in the field of software engineering. A number of research techniques have been proposed and used in evaluating research prototypes. We take the view that evaluation of software engineering tools is best achieved in industrial settings, with real life artifacts and tasks, and with professional software engineers. However, the feasibility of such evaluation is limited for many reasons. Some challenges are related to the prototypes under study, others are related to the industrial environments where the need to meet business requirements take precedence on experimenting with new tools and techniques. In this paper, we summarize our experiences in evaluating a research prototype tool using a grounded theory study, a questionnaire, and a controlled experiment. We discuss the challenges that hindered our industrial evaluation and share ideas on how to overcome these challenges. We propose an action research study where the research tool is used by a small number of experienced professionals in an industrial project.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同成熟度阶段研究原型的实证评价
特别是在软件工程领域,对研究工具的实证评估正在增长。许多研究技术已被提出并用于评估研究原型。我们认为,软件工程工具的评估最好是在工业环境中实现的,与现实生活中的工件和任务,以及与专业的软件工程师。然而,由于许多原因,这种评价的可行性受到限制。一些挑战与正在研究的原型有关,另一些挑战与工业环境有关,在工业环境中,满足业务需求的需要优先于试验新的工具和技术。在本文中,我们总结了我们在评估研究原型工具方面的经验,采用了扎实的理论研究,问卷调查和对照实验。我们讨论了阻碍我们工业评估的挑战,并就如何克服这些挑战分享了想法。我们提出一个行动研究研究,其中的研究工具是由少数经验丰富的专业人士在一个工业项目中使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How to evaluate a conflict minimizing task scheduler through a user study Empirical evaluation of research prototypes at variable stages of maturity A proposed recommender system for eliciting software sustainability requirements Surveying developer knowledge and interest in code smells through online freelance marketplaces On planning an evaluation of the impact of identifier names on the readability and quality of smalltalk programs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1