SOSYAL BİLİMLER VE FEN BİLİMLERİ ALANLARINDAKİ AKADEMİK MAKALELERDE KULLANILAN BİLİM DİLİNİN İNCELENMESİ

Zeynep Zeliha Sonkaya
{"title":"SOSYAL BİLİMLER VE FEN BİLİMLERİ ALANLARINDAKİ AKADEMİK MAKALELERDE KULLANILAN BİLİM DİLİNİN İNCELENMESİ","authors":"Zeynep Zeliha Sonkaya","doi":"10.30568/tullis.832105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Academic or scientific language is widely recognized as being expressed in standard language rather than any non-standard language variant or dialect. Scientific language is commonly used a form of language which is closely related with writing rather than speaking. In particular, scientific language is used in academic articles. Despite this, scientific language is included some differences for each scientific field. Determining these differences highly important to right usage of academic writing language. For this reason, in this study, it was aimed to investigate the scientific language of academic manuscripts in the fields of social and physical sciences. For this purpose, a total of 10 manuscripts (5 social sciences + 5 physical sciences) were selected randomly belonging to the last volume of several journals of Ankara University. The journals were consisted of Political Sciences, Revolution history, Turkish Language, Educational Sciences, Theology, Veterinary, Engineering, Agriculture and sport sciences. Scientific language of social and physical sciences was examined as comparative in terms of conjunctions, tenses, active and passive voices and terms. As a consequence of the study, it was found to be differences between the scientific language of social and physical sciences.","PeriodicalId":117222,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Turkic Language and Literature Surveys (TULLIS)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Turkic Language and Literature Surveys (TULLIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30568/tullis.832105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Academic or scientific language is widely recognized as being expressed in standard language rather than any non-standard language variant or dialect. Scientific language is commonly used a form of language which is closely related with writing rather than speaking. In particular, scientific language is used in academic articles. Despite this, scientific language is included some differences for each scientific field. Determining these differences highly important to right usage of academic writing language. For this reason, in this study, it was aimed to investigate the scientific language of academic manuscripts in the fields of social and physical sciences. For this purpose, a total of 10 manuscripts (5 social sciences + 5 physical sciences) were selected randomly belonging to the last volume of several journals of Ankara University. The journals were consisted of Political Sciences, Revolution history, Turkish Language, Educational Sciences, Theology, Veterinary, Engineering, Agriculture and sport sciences. Scientific language of social and physical sciences was examined as comparative in terms of conjunctions, tenses, active and passive voices and terms. As a consequence of the study, it was found to be differences between the scientific language of social and physical sciences.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学术或科学语言被广泛认为是用标准语言表达的,而不是任何非标准语言变体或方言。科学语言是一种常用的语言形式,它与书写而不是口语密切相关。特别是在学术文章中使用科学语言。尽管如此,科学语言在每个科学领域都存在一些差异。确定这些差异对于学术写作语言的正确使用至关重要。因此,本研究旨在探讨社会科学和物理科学领域学术手稿的科学语言。为此,从安卡拉大学几本期刊的最后一卷中随机抽取10篇手稿(5篇社会科学+ 5篇物理科学)。这些期刊包括政治学、革命历史、土耳其语、教育科学、神学、兽医、工程、农业和体育科学。社会科学和自然科学的科学语言在连词、时态、主动和被动语态和术语方面被作为比较级进行了研究。这项研究的结果是,社会科学和自然科学的科学语言之间存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ÂŞIK VEYSEL HAKKINDA BİBLİYOGRAFYA DENEMESİ SARPKAYA, Seçkin ve SOLMAZ, Erhan (2023). Behlül Dânâ Fıkraları AN ATTEMPT AT BIBLIOGRAPHY ON ANTALYA SUBDIALECTS ÖZTÜRK, Fatih ve AYKAÇ, Onur (2022). Baba Ravşan Destanı (Özbek Varyantı) Şeyhülislâm Ebû Said-zâde Feyzullah Efendi’nin Temmûziyye Kasidesi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1