Dossier Updates During Dossier Evaluation: ECHA’s New Approach

M. Ahlhaus, M. Öttinger
{"title":"Dossier Updates During Dossier Evaluation: ECHA’s New Approach","authors":"M. Ahlhaus, M. Öttinger","doi":"10.21552/icrl/2019/4/9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On 29 November 2019, ECHA published a short news release and amended versions of several Q&A entries as well as their Practical guide: How to act in dossier evaluation, describing its new approach regarding dossier updates during a dossier evaluation process. Although this seems to be a reaction to the Board of Appeal decision in the case A-001-2018 of 9 April 2019 (BrüggemannChemical), the published approach stands in clear contrast to the findings of the Board of Appeal in this case.","PeriodicalId":375592,"journal":{"name":"International Chemical Regulatory and Law Review","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Chemical Regulatory and Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21552/icrl/2019/4/9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On 29 November 2019, ECHA published a short news release and amended versions of several Q&A entries as well as their Practical guide: How to act in dossier evaluation, describing its new approach regarding dossier updates during a dossier evaluation process. Although this seems to be a reaction to the Board of Appeal decision in the case A-001-2018 of 9 April 2019 (BrüggemannChemical), the published approach stands in clear contrast to the findings of the Board of Appeal in this case.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
档案评估期间的档案更新:ECHA的新方法
2019年11月29日,ECHA发布了一份简短的新闻稿和几个问答条目的修订版本,以及他们的实用指南:如何在档案评估中采取行动,描述了在档案评估过程中关于档案更新的新方法。尽管这似乎是对2019年4月9日案件a -001-2018 (br ggemanannchemical)中上诉委员会决定的反应,但公布的方法与此案中上诉委员会的调查结果形成鲜明对比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
General Court: Further Clarification on SVHC Status of Bisphenol A Administrative Precedent and the Application of the REACH Regulation - 10 Years of the ECHA Board of Appeal The Authorisation Scheme for Biocidal Products in Switzerland The SCIP Database under Directive (EU) 2018/851 Legal Requirements of Korean Biocide Regulation (K-BPR) and Korean REACH (K-REACH)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1