PERBANDINGAN ESTIMASI ANGGARAN BIAYA METODE AHSP 2022 DAN HSPK 2022 PADA PROYEK PEMBANGUNGAN GEDUNG UKM POLITEKNIK PU SEMARANG

Agung Sutarto, M. Arifin, Aufa Ardianto
{"title":"PERBANDINGAN ESTIMASI ANGGARAN BIAYA METODE AHSP 2022 DAN HSPK 2022 PADA PROYEK PEMBANGUNGAN GEDUNG UKM POLITEKNIK PU SEMARANG","authors":"Agung Sutarto, M. Arifin, Aufa Ardianto","doi":"10.53866/jimi.v3i1.226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Budget Plan is an important process in project planning as it forms the basis for making a price offer and estimation framework that will be used in tendering. It aims to consider the cost involved during the project implementation. The aim of this study is to determine which method is more economical in estimating the budget cost using the 2022 AHSP and 2022 HSPK methods. The research method used is a combination of observation and comparative quantitative methods. Observation was carried out through direct observation of structural work and work methods, while comparative quantitative method aims to estimate budget costs using the 2022 AHSP and 2022 HSPK methods. Based on the cost estimate, it can be concluded that the labor cost using the AHSP method is IDR 5,305,910,140 and using the HSPK method is IDR 31,967,258,039 with a difference percentage of 33.74%. The material cost using the AHSP method is IDR 30,389,347,431 and using the HSPK method is IDR 22,208,028,819 with a difference percentage of 0.49%. The budget plan using the AHSP method is IDR 31,980,611,351 and using the HSPK method is IDR 28,189,908,555 with a difference percentage of 5.24%. In this study, the result shows that the most economical budget cost estimate was obtained by using the HSPK method in the overall budget plan, as well as labor and material costs.","PeriodicalId":414894,"journal":{"name":"Citizen : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Citizen : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53866/jimi.v3i1.226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Budget Plan is an important process in project planning as it forms the basis for making a price offer and estimation framework that will be used in tendering. It aims to consider the cost involved during the project implementation. The aim of this study is to determine which method is more economical in estimating the budget cost using the 2022 AHSP and 2022 HSPK methods. The research method used is a combination of observation and comparative quantitative methods. Observation was carried out through direct observation of structural work and work methods, while comparative quantitative method aims to estimate budget costs using the 2022 AHSP and 2022 HSPK methods. Based on the cost estimate, it can be concluded that the labor cost using the AHSP method is IDR 5,305,910,140 and using the HSPK method is IDR 31,967,258,039 with a difference percentage of 33.74%. The material cost using the AHSP method is IDR 30,389,347,431 and using the HSPK method is IDR 22,208,028,819 with a difference percentage of 0.49%. The budget plan using the AHSP method is IDR 31,980,611,351 and using the HSPK method is IDR 28,189,908,555 with a difference percentage of 5.24%. In this study, the result shows that the most economical budget cost estimate was obtained by using the HSPK method in the overall budget plan, as well as labor and material costs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将AHSP - 2022方法成本估计值与HSPK - 2022计划中的UKM POLITEKNIK PU三宝垄项目进行比较
预算计划是项目规划中的一个重要过程,因为它构成了在招标中使用的报价和估算框架的基础。它的目的是考虑项目实施过程中所涉及的成本。本研究的目的是确定哪种方法在使用2022 AHSP和2022 HSPK方法估算预算成本时更经济。研究方法采用观察法和比较定量法相结合的方法。通过对结构工程和施工方法的直接观察进行观测,对比定量法采用2022 AHSP和2022 HSPK方法估算预算成本。根据成本估算,AHSP法的人工成本为5,305,910,140印尼盾,HSPK法的人工成本为31,967,258,039印尼盾,差异百分比为33.74%。AHSP法材料成本为30,389,347,431印尼盾,HSPK法材料成本为22,208,028,819印尼盾,差异百分比为0.49%。AHSP方法的预算为31,980,611,351印尼盾,HSPK方法的预算为28,189,908,555印尼盾,差异百分比为5.24%。本研究结果表明,在整体预算方案中,采用HSPK方法获得最经济的预算成本估算,以及人工和材料成本估算。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PENGARUH ELECTRONIC WORD OF MOUTH (E-WOM) TERHADAP LOYALITAS KONSUMEN DENGAN KEPUTUSAN PEMBELIAN SEBAGAI VARIABEL MEDIASI (Studi Kasus Pada Konsumen Wanita Monokrom Store Yogyakarta) ANALISA OPTIMASI WAKTU DAN BIAYA DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE DURATION COST TRADE OFF PADA PROYEK PEMBANGUNAN PENANGANAN ROB ERETAN KABUPATEN INDRAMAYU JAWA BARAT HAK MEWARIS ANAK ANGKAT DI INDONESIA DITINJAU DARI HUKUM PERDATA DAN HUKUM ISLAM FENOMENA POLITIK IDENTITAS DALAM PEMILU DI INDONESIA ANALISIS STRUKTUR KOLOM PADA GEDUNG PARKIR RUMAH SAKIT DI SEMARANG
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1