Backtesting the Bayesian Bornhuetter-Ferguson method against traditional approaches in claims reserving

Matteo Crisafulli, G. P. Clemente
{"title":"Backtesting the Bayesian Bornhuetter-Ferguson method against traditional approaches in claims reserving","authors":"Matteo Crisafulli, G. P. Clemente","doi":"10.1080/09720510.2021.1995216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Evaluation of claims reserve is a paramount process for non-life insurance company. To this end, several deterministic and stochastic methodologies have been provided in the literature. Therefore, the validation of the models on actual data and the comparison of these models appropriateness is nowadays a crucial question. We focus here on different Bornhuetter-Ferguson methodologies and we backtest the behavior of these models using the well-known dataset made available in [22]. The aim is to test both the ability of different models to well predict future losses as well as to evaluate the effects of different priors on the results. Additionally, we test the uncertainty of the predictions by comparing the coefficient of variation.","PeriodicalId":270059,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Statistics and Management Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Statistics and Management Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09720510.2021.1995216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Evaluation of claims reserve is a paramount process for non-life insurance company. To this end, several deterministic and stochastic methodologies have been provided in the literature. Therefore, the validation of the models on actual data and the comparison of these models appropriateness is nowadays a crucial question. We focus here on different Bornhuetter-Ferguson methodologies and we backtest the behavior of these models using the well-known dataset made available in [22]. The aim is to test both the ability of different models to well predict future losses as well as to evaluate the effects of different priors on the results. Additionally, we test the uncertainty of the predictions by comparing the coefficient of variation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
贝叶斯-伯恩威特-弗格森法对传统索赔保留方法的回溯检验
摘要理赔准备金的评估是财产保险公司的重要工作。为此,文献中提供了几种确定性和随机方法。因此,模型在实际数据上的验证和模型适用性的比较是当前的一个关键问题。我们在这里关注不同的bornhutter - ferguson方法,并使用[22]中提供的知名数据集对这些模型的行为进行回测。目的是测试不同模型预测未来损失的能力,以及评估不同先验对结果的影响。此外,我们通过比较变异系数来检验预测的不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rainfall and outlier rain prediction with ARIMA and ANN models Industry-academia collaboration in higher education institutes: With special emphasis on B-schools Acclimatization of spirituality in leadership and management Time series forecasting of stock price of AirAsia Berhad using ARIMA model during COVID- 19 Optimization of multi-echelon reverse supply chain network using genetic algorithm
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1