An Examination of U.S. State Pensions by Total State Expenditures, State Budget Deficit, and Red v. Blue State

Don H. Chamberlain, Murphy D. Smith, Randall B. Bunker
{"title":"An Examination of U.S. State Pensions by Total State Expenditures, State Budget Deficit, and Red v. Blue State","authors":"Don H. Chamberlain, Murphy D. Smith, Randall B. Bunker","doi":"10.1504/IJEA.2016.076748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pensions are important to government employees. In the USA, some states fund almost 100% of the present value of future pension obligations; while in other states, the funding is substantially lacking. Results of this study show that states with lower state expenditures per capita, relative to states with higher expenditures, have provided better funding of their state pensions. States with lower budget deficits, relative to states with higher budget deficits, paid a significantly higher percent of annual required contributions. This suggests that states that are more fiscally conservative (lower budget deficit) do a better job of making required annual contributions to their state pensions. The red (Republican) states paid a higher proportion of required annual contributions than blue (Democrat) states, 90 versus 84%, respectively; but this difference was not statistically significant. All states have an ethical responsibility to meet the pension obligations owed to their state government employees.","PeriodicalId":221919,"journal":{"name":"ERN: National","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: National","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEA.2016.076748","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pensions are important to government employees. In the USA, some states fund almost 100% of the present value of future pension obligations; while in other states, the funding is substantially lacking. Results of this study show that states with lower state expenditures per capita, relative to states with higher expenditures, have provided better funding of their state pensions. States with lower budget deficits, relative to states with higher budget deficits, paid a significantly higher percent of annual required contributions. This suggests that states that are more fiscally conservative (lower budget deficit) do a better job of making required annual contributions to their state pensions. The red (Republican) states paid a higher proportion of required annual contributions than blue (Democrat) states, 90 versus 84%, respectively; but this difference was not statistically significant. All states have an ethical responsibility to meet the pension obligations owed to their state government employees.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从州总支出、州预算赤字和红蓝州对美国州养老金的考察
养老金对政府雇员很重要。在美国,一些州为未来养老金义务的现值提供了几乎100%的资金;而在其他州,资金严重缺乏。这项研究的结果表明,相对于支出较高的州,人均支出较低的州为其州养老金提供了更好的资金。相对于预算赤字较高的国家,预算赤字较低的国家支付的年度所需会费比例要高得多。这表明财政较为保守(预算赤字较低)的州在按要求缴纳州养老金方面做得更好。红色州(共和党)比蓝色州(民主党)支付了更高比例的年度缴费,分别为90%和84%;但这种差异在统计上并不显著。所有州都有道德责任履行对州政府雇员的养老金义务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Film Tax Credits Across State Lines The Contestation of the Notion of Debt-Trap Diplomacy on Nigeria-China Relations: The Dilemma and Critical Issues Australian Federalism in James Buchanan's Early Work on Fiscal Equity Convergence across Subnational Regions of Bangladesh – What the Night Lights Data Say? The Effects of Local Government Financial Distress: Evidence from Toxic Loans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1