I wish I had understood this at the beginning: dilemmas in research, teaching, and the introduction of technology in engineering design courses

J. Turns, M. Guzdial, F. Mistree, J. Allen, D. Rosen
{"title":"I wish I had understood this at the beginning: dilemmas in research, teaching, and the introduction of technology in engineering design courses","authors":"J. Turns, M. Guzdial, F. Mistree, J. Allen, D. Rosen","doi":"10.1109/FIE.1995.483046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Advances in computer technology have made it feasible to provide engineering design students with computer support for learning about and performing various activities in the engineering design process. Important issues for consideration are how to design the computer tools and how to integrate these tools into existing courses. We have focused our efforts on learning how to design collaboration software and also on understanding how to integrate it into an engineering design course. We conducted two quarters of a formative evaluation, during which our software (CaMILE, an Internet based collaboration tool) was used by third year mechanical engineering design students. These students were introduced to and received support for the software in the context of a special voluntary laboratory course focusing more generally on technological support for their efforts in the design course. Our reflections on this experience have led to the identification of the three dilemmas described in the paper: evaluation in or out of the classroom; more with less or more with more; and compatibility of learning about and learning through collaboration. While the three dilemmas were identified in the context of our specific efforts, findings from other educational technology projects as well as other domains support their generality. The paper provides the context for understanding the dilemmas, a description of each, and the impact of each on our current endeavors.","PeriodicalId":137465,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1995 25th Annual Conference. Engineering Education for the 21st Century","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1995 25th Annual Conference. Engineering Education for the 21st Century","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.1995.483046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Advances in computer technology have made it feasible to provide engineering design students with computer support for learning about and performing various activities in the engineering design process. Important issues for consideration are how to design the computer tools and how to integrate these tools into existing courses. We have focused our efforts on learning how to design collaboration software and also on understanding how to integrate it into an engineering design course. We conducted two quarters of a formative evaluation, during which our software (CaMILE, an Internet based collaboration tool) was used by third year mechanical engineering design students. These students were introduced to and received support for the software in the context of a special voluntary laboratory course focusing more generally on technological support for their efforts in the design course. Our reflections on this experience have led to the identification of the three dilemmas described in the paper: evaluation in or out of the classroom; more with less or more with more; and compatibility of learning about and learning through collaboration. While the three dilemmas were identified in the context of our specific efforts, findings from other educational technology projects as well as other domains support their generality. The paper provides the context for understanding the dilemmas, a description of each, and the impact of each on our current endeavors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我希望我一开始就能理解这一点:在研究、教学和工程设计课程中引入技术方面的困境
计算机技术的进步使得为工程设计专业的学生提供计算机支持来学习和执行工程设计过程中的各种活动成为可能。需要考虑的重要问题是如何设计计算机工具以及如何将这些工具集成到现有课程中。我们集中精力学习如何设计协作软件,以及如何将其集成到工程设计课程中。我们进行了两个季度的形成性评估,在此期间,我们的软件(CaMILE,一个基于互联网的协作工具)被三年级机械工程设计专业的学生使用。这些学生是在一门特殊的自愿实验课程的背景下被介绍并获得软件支持的,这门课程更侧重于为他们在设计课程中的努力提供技术支持。我们对这一经验的反思导致了本文所描述的三个困境的识别:课堂内或课堂外的评估;多与少或多与多;以及通过合作学习和学习的兼容性。虽然这三个困境是在我们具体努力的背景下确定的,但来自其他教育技术项目以及其他领域的研究结果支持它们的普遍性。本文提供了理解困境的背景,描述了每个困境,以及每个困境对我们当前努力的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interfaces between the Foundation Coalition integrated curriculum and programs for honors, minority, women, and transfer students Toward a pre-disciplinary introductory design sequence People, product and process: interactive multimedia case study in integrated design and manufacturing strategies Systems model for learning A faculty-driven quality initiative at the Colorado School of Mines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1