Distinguishing Human-Written and ChatGPT-Generated Text Using Machine Learning

Hosam Alamleh, A. A. AlQahtani, A. ElSaid
{"title":"Distinguishing Human-Written and ChatGPT-Generated Text Using Machine Learning","authors":"Hosam Alamleh, A. A. AlQahtani, A. ElSaid","doi":"10.1109/SIEDS58326.2023.10137767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of sophisticated Artificial Intelligence (AI) language models, including ChatGPT, has led to growing concerns regarding the ability to distinguish between human-written and AI-generated text in academic and scholarly settings. This study seeks to evaluate the effectiveness of machine learning algorithms in differentiating between human-written and AI-generated text. To accomplish this, we collected responses from Computer Science students for both essay and programming assignments. We then trained and evaluated several machine learning models, including Logistic Regression (LR), Decision Trees (DT), Support Vector Machines (SVM), Neural Networks (NN), and Random Forests (RF), based on accuracy, computational efficiency, and confusion matrices. By comparing the performance of these models, we identified the most suitable one for the task at hand. The use of machine learning algorithms for detecting text generated by AI has significant potential for applications in content moderation, plagiarism detection, and quality control for text generation systems, thereby contributing to the preservation of academic integrity in the face of rapidly advancing AI-driven content generation.","PeriodicalId":267464,"journal":{"name":"2023 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIEDS58326.2023.10137767","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The use of sophisticated Artificial Intelligence (AI) language models, including ChatGPT, has led to growing concerns regarding the ability to distinguish between human-written and AI-generated text in academic and scholarly settings. This study seeks to evaluate the effectiveness of machine learning algorithms in differentiating between human-written and AI-generated text. To accomplish this, we collected responses from Computer Science students for both essay and programming assignments. We then trained and evaluated several machine learning models, including Logistic Regression (LR), Decision Trees (DT), Support Vector Machines (SVM), Neural Networks (NN), and Random Forests (RF), based on accuracy, computational efficiency, and confusion matrices. By comparing the performance of these models, we identified the most suitable one for the task at hand. The use of machine learning algorithms for detecting text generated by AI has significant potential for applications in content moderation, plagiarism detection, and quality control for text generation systems, thereby contributing to the preservation of academic integrity in the face of rapidly advancing AI-driven content generation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用机器学习区分人类编写的和chatgpt生成的文本
包括ChatGPT在内的复杂人工智能(AI)语言模型的使用,导致人们越来越关注在学术和学术环境中区分人类写作和人工智能生成文本的能力。本研究旨在评估机器学习算法在区分人类编写和人工智能生成文本方面的有效性。为了做到这一点,我们收集了计算机科学专业学生的论文和编程作业的反馈。然后,我们训练和评估了几种机器学习模型,包括逻辑回归(LR)、决策树(DT)、支持向量机(SVM)、神经网络(NN)和随机森林(RF),这些模型基于准确性、计算效率和混淆矩阵。通过比较这些模型的性能,我们确定了最适合手头任务的模型。使用机器学习算法来检测人工智能生成的文本,在内容审核、剽窃检测和文本生成系统的质量控制方面具有巨大的应用潜力,从而有助于在人工智能驱动的内容生成快速发展的情况下保持学术诚信。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Car Wash Deterrent System Solar-Powered Refrigerator on Wheels: An Engineering Design Challenge Adapting Hydropower Operations to Support Renewable Energy Transitions and Freshwater Sustainability in the Columbia River Basin Methods for the Spatial Analysis of Invasive Species and Ecosystem Fragmentation at Conservation Sites in Malta Using Drones * Investigating the Stability of Organic Materials for Commercial Dyeing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1