KAJIAN HUKUM TERHADAP PELAKSANAAN EKSEKUSI ANAK OLEH PENGADILAN AGAMA DALAM SUATU PUTUSAN PERCERAIAN

Rai Mantili
{"title":"KAJIAN HUKUM TERHADAP PELAKSANAAN EKSEKUSI ANAK OLEH PENGADILAN AGAMA DALAM SUATU PUTUSAN PERCERAIAN","authors":"Rai Mantili","doi":"10.37090/keadilan.v20i2.725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Execution as a legal action taken by the court to the losing party in a case is a further rule and procedure of the case examination process. Execution or execution of a decision is an act carried out by force against the losing party in a case. Not all court decisions have executive power, not all court decisions can be executed. In a divorce case in the Religious Courts, if the judge has given a decision that one of the parties has been won as the holder of custody, then the party who must voluntarily hand over his custody rights to the winning party voluntarily. This is a lot in practice, often parties who do not want to give up custody of their children to the winning party. The results of this study indicate that the execution of child custody has two kinds of obstacles. The first obstacle is the \"psychological obstacle of the child\", because the child is not an object that can be executed and the second obstacle is a matter of cost, if the child is on the losing side but the losing party does not want to give up custody of the child to the winning party, who will will pay a fee if requesting the services of the police to force the child, because there is no state budget for the execution of child custody. \n Keywords: Divorce, religious courts, execution of children.","PeriodicalId":143961,"journal":{"name":"Keadilan","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Keadilan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37090/keadilan.v20i2.725","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Execution as a legal action taken by the court to the losing party in a case is a further rule and procedure of the case examination process. Execution or execution of a decision is an act carried out by force against the losing party in a case. Not all court decisions have executive power, not all court decisions can be executed. In a divorce case in the Religious Courts, if the judge has given a decision that one of the parties has been won as the holder of custody, then the party who must voluntarily hand over his custody rights to the winning party voluntarily. This is a lot in practice, often parties who do not want to give up custody of their children to the winning party. The results of this study indicate that the execution of child custody has two kinds of obstacles. The first obstacle is the "psychological obstacle of the child", because the child is not an object that can be executed and the second obstacle is a matter of cost, if the child is on the losing side but the losing party does not want to give up custody of the child to the winning party, who will will pay a fee if requesting the services of the police to force the child, because there is no state budget for the execution of child custody.  Keywords: Divorce, religious courts, execution of children.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宗教法庭对执行儿童死刑的法律审查是离婚判决
执行作为法院对案件败诉方采取的法律行动,是案件审查过程的进一步规则和程序。判决的执行是对案件败诉方强制执行的行为。并不是所有的法院判决都具有执行力,也不是所有的法院判决都可以执行。在宗教法院审理的离婚案件中,如果法官判决一方当事人胜诉为监护权持有人,则一方当事人必须自愿将其监护权移交给胜诉一方。这种情况在实践中很多,当事人往往不愿意将孩子的监护权交给胜诉一方。本研究结果表明,儿童监护权的执行存在两种障碍。第一个障碍是儿童“心理障碍”,因为孩子不是一个对象可以执行第二个障碍是成本的问题,如果孩子失去一侧但败诉一方不想放弃孩子的监护权获胜的政党,谁将会支付费用,如果请求的服务警察强迫孩子,因为没有国家预算执行的孩子的监护权。关键词:离婚,宗教法庭,执行子女。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
IMPLIKASI HUKUM PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NO. 20/PUU-XIV/ 2016 TERHADAP PEMBUKTIAN PERDATA DI INDONESIA PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA ILLEGAL LOGGING MELALUI PENDEKATAN PENCUCIAN UANG TANGGUNG GUGAT BALAI LELANG TERHADAP PENJUALAN OBJEK LELANG SECARA ONLINE KONVERGENSI HUKUM PERSAINGAN USAHA TERHADAP KOMUNIKASI BISNIS DI SEKTOR EKONOMI DIGITAL IMPLEMENTASI PASAL 55 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 6 TAHUN 2018 TENTANG KEKARANTINAAN KESEHATAN PADA MASA PANDEMI COVID-19 (STUDI KASUS KOTA BANDAR LAMPUNG)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1