Directed Self-Explanation in the Study of Statistics

N. Broers, Marieke Mur, L. Budé
{"title":"Directed Self-Explanation in the Study of Statistics","authors":"N. Broers, Marieke Mur, L. Budé","doi":"10.52041/srap.04102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Constructivist learning theory has suggested that students can only obtain conceptual understanding of a knowledge domain by actively trying to integrate new concepts and ideas into their existing knowledge framework. In practice, this means that students will have to explain novel ideas, concepts, and principles to themselves. Various methods have been developed that aim to stimulate the student to self-explain. In this study, two such methods were contrasted in a randomized experiment. In one condition students were stimulated to self-explain in an undirected way. In the other the stimulus to self-explain was directed. We examined whether the directive method leads to a greater level of conceptual understanding. To assess conceptual understanding we asked students to construct a concept map and to take a 10-item multiple-choice test. The results are somewhat contradictory but do suggest that the directive method may be of value. We discuss the possibility of integrating that method in the statistics curriculum.","PeriodicalId":447331,"journal":{"name":"Curricular Development in Statistics Education IASE Roundtable Conference","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curricular Development in Statistics Education IASE Roundtable Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52041/srap.04102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Constructivist learning theory has suggested that students can only obtain conceptual understanding of a knowledge domain by actively trying to integrate new concepts and ideas into their existing knowledge framework. In practice, this means that students will have to explain novel ideas, concepts, and principles to themselves. Various methods have been developed that aim to stimulate the student to self-explain. In this study, two such methods were contrasted in a randomized experiment. In one condition students were stimulated to self-explain in an undirected way. In the other the stimulus to self-explain was directed. We examined whether the directive method leads to a greater level of conceptual understanding. To assess conceptual understanding we asked students to construct a concept map and to take a 10-item multiple-choice test. The results are somewhat contradictory but do suggest that the directive method may be of value. We discuss the possibility of integrating that method in the statistics curriculum.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
统计学研究中的定向自我解释
建构主义学习理论认为,学生只有通过积极尝试将新的概念和想法整合到现有的知识框架中,才能获得对知识领域的概念性理解。在实践中,这意味着学生必须自己解释新的想法、概念和原理。已经开发了各种方法,目的是刺激学生自我解释。在本研究中,两种方法在随机实验中进行对比。在一种情况下,学生们被刺激以一种无导向的方式自我解释。在另一种情况下,自我解释的刺激是直接的。我们研究了指令方法是否会导致更高层次的概念理解。为了评估学生对概念的理解,我们要求学生绘制概念图,并进行10项多项选择题测试。结果有些矛盾,但确实表明指示方法可能是有价值的。我们讨论了在统计学课程中整合这种方法的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Uncovering and Developing Student Statistical Competences via New Interfaces Curriculum Innovations Based on Census Microdata: A Meeting of Statistics, Mathematics, and Social Science Developing Statistical Thinking in a Secondary School: A Collaborative Curriculum Development Statistical Literacy Curriculum Design Consideration of Variation: A Model for Curriculum Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1