Analysis on Cognitive Thinking of an Assessment System Using Revised Bloom's Taxonomy

Uma Damotharan, Thenmozhi Sengapalli, Rabin Hansda
{"title":"Analysis on Cognitive Thinking of an Assessment System Using Revised Bloom's Taxonomy","authors":"Uma Damotharan, Thenmozhi Sengapalli, Rabin Hansda","doi":"10.1109/MITE.2017.00033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Teaching and learning is an important process in any educational system to evaluate the performance of both students and the entire system. To meet the great demands for educators and to fill the gap between teaching-learning process and learning outcomes, a great shift is required in an assessment system. Assessment being an important performance measure, it should give an opportunity to students to explore their thinking skills. The present study focuses on analyzing the thinking skills present in an assessment using revised Blooms Taxonomy standards. Three different categories of courses have been considered for the present analysis to study the different thinking skills that are present in an assessment paper. It also analyzes the complexity level present in an assessment and to know the quality of the system. Present study uses a weight-based data mining approach to classify the Blooms categories and the thinking levels associated with that. This study also reveals that the identifying the thinking levels is not same for all kinds of course types.","PeriodicalId":103416,"journal":{"name":"2017 5th IEEE International Conference on MOOCs, Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE)","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 5th IEEE International Conference on MOOCs, Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MITE.2017.00033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Teaching and learning is an important process in any educational system to evaluate the performance of both students and the entire system. To meet the great demands for educators and to fill the gap between teaching-learning process and learning outcomes, a great shift is required in an assessment system. Assessment being an important performance measure, it should give an opportunity to students to explore their thinking skills. The present study focuses on analyzing the thinking skills present in an assessment using revised Blooms Taxonomy standards. Three different categories of courses have been considered for the present analysis to study the different thinking skills that are present in an assessment paper. It also analyzes the complexity level present in an assessment and to know the quality of the system. Present study uses a weight-based data mining approach to classify the Blooms categories and the thinking levels associated with that. This study also reveals that the identifying the thinking levels is not same for all kinds of course types.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于修正布鲁姆分类法的评价系统认知思维分析
教与学是任何教育系统中评估学生和整个系统表现的重要过程。为了满足对教育工作者的巨大需求,填补教学过程与学习成果之间的差距,评估体系需要发生重大转变。考核作为一项重要的绩效考核,它应该给学生一个机会去探索他们的思维能力。本研究的重点是分析思维能力,目前在评估使用修订的布鲁姆分类法标准。本分析考虑了三种不同类别的课程,以研究评估论文中出现的不同思维技能。它还分析了评估中存在的复杂程度,从而了解系统的质量。本研究使用基于权重的数据挖掘方法对bloom类别和与之相关的思维水平进行分类。本研究还揭示了不同课程类型对思维层次的识别不尽相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Approach for Evaluating Program Educational Objectives Using Indirect Method Value Based Curriculum Design for Engineering Studies Analyzing the Responses of Primary School Children in Dyslexia Screening Tests Collaborative Interdisciplinary Teaching and Learning Across Borders, Using Mobile Technologies and Smart Devices A Ranking Framework for Higher Education Institutions in India: A Policy Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1