Ben Sira’s Praise of the Ancestors of Old (Sir 44–49): The History of Israel as Parenetic Apologetics

Alexander A. Di Lella
{"title":"Ben Sira’s Praise of the Ancestors of Old (Sir 44–49): The History of Israel as Parenetic Apologetics","authors":"Alexander A. Di Lella","doi":"10.1515/9783110186604.151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"That Ben Sira was completely immersed in the traditions of Israel’s history and sacred literature is a commonplace in biblical studies. Even a casual reading of the book would convince one of that. Since he was a well-educated and cultured Jew who had travelled extensively in the Hellenistic world (Sir 34:12-13)1, we can reasonably assume that he was at least familiar with some Greek literary works and with the various genres of Greek historical writing2, But this does not mean that Ben Sira modeled in any way his Praise of the Ancestors on Greek literature. From the earlier parts of the OT he had all the historical models he would have needed. Thomas R. Lee, however, believes that Ben Sira did indeed base the Praise on Greek literature, and he argues that of all the Hellenistic literary genres Ben Sira was principally indebted to the encomium3. While acknowledging the importance of Lee’s study, Burton L. Mack believes that this study needs revision. Mack’s thesis, accordingly, is that Ben Sira “was conversant with Hellenistic historiography, biography, and the encomium, but that each provided models only for certain aspects of the poem [44-50]”4. The arguments in support of the thesis that Ben Sira modeled the Praise on Greek literature are slim and, in my judgment, unconvincing. The reason is that, since Ben Sira explicitly and frequently warns his students/readers against the blandishments of Greek ideas and ideals5, he would be unlikely to employ Greek genres for his great poem in Praise of Israel’s Ancestors. R.N. Whybray appropriately remarks: “If Ben Sira thought it important to include a ‘historiographical’ section to his wis-","PeriodicalId":393675,"journal":{"name":"Deuterocanonical and Cognate Literature. Yearbook","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Deuterocanonical and Cognate Literature. Yearbook","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110186604.151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

That Ben Sira was completely immersed in the traditions of Israel’s history and sacred literature is a commonplace in biblical studies. Even a casual reading of the book would convince one of that. Since he was a well-educated and cultured Jew who had travelled extensively in the Hellenistic world (Sir 34:12-13)1, we can reasonably assume that he was at least familiar with some Greek literary works and with the various genres of Greek historical writing2, But this does not mean that Ben Sira modeled in any way his Praise of the Ancestors on Greek literature. From the earlier parts of the OT he had all the historical models he would have needed. Thomas R. Lee, however, believes that Ben Sira did indeed base the Praise on Greek literature, and he argues that of all the Hellenistic literary genres Ben Sira was principally indebted to the encomium3. While acknowledging the importance of Lee’s study, Burton L. Mack believes that this study needs revision. Mack’s thesis, accordingly, is that Ben Sira “was conversant with Hellenistic historiography, biography, and the encomium, but that each provided models only for certain aspects of the poem [44-50]”4. The arguments in support of the thesis that Ben Sira modeled the Praise on Greek literature are slim and, in my judgment, unconvincing. The reason is that, since Ben Sira explicitly and frequently warns his students/readers against the blandishments of Greek ideas and ideals5, he would be unlikely to employ Greek genres for his great poem in Praise of Israel’s Ancestors. R.N. Whybray appropriately remarks: “If Ben Sira thought it important to include a ‘historiographical’ section to his wis-
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本·西拉对古老祖先的赞美(Sir 44-49):以色列作为父母护教的历史
本·西拉完全沉浸在以色列历史和神圣文学的传统中,这在圣经研究中是司空见惯的。即使随便读一下这本书,也会让人相信这一点。由于他是一个受过良好教育和有文化的犹太人,曾在希腊化的世界广泛旅行(Sir 34:12-13),我们可以合理地假设他至少熟悉一些希腊文学作品和希腊历史著作的各种体裁,但这并不意味着本·西拉的《先祖颂》在任何方面都是模仿希腊文学的。从旧约的早期开始,他就有了他需要的所有历史模型。然而,托马斯·r·李认为,本·西拉的确是以希腊文学为基础创作《赞美诗》的。他认为,在所有希腊化的文学体裁中,本·西拉主要得益于《赞美诗》。虽然承认李研究的重要性,但Burton L. Mack认为这项研究需要修订。因此,麦克的论点是,本·西拉“精通希腊化的史学、传记和赞美诗,但每一种都只为这首诗的某些方面提供了模型[44-50]”。支持本·西拉将《赞美诗》模仿希腊文学这一论点的论据并不充分,而且在我看来,缺乏说服力。原因是,由于本·西拉明确而频繁地警告他的学生/读者不要受希腊思想和理想的蛊骗,他不太可能在他的伟大诗篇《赞美以色列的祖先》中使用希腊体裁。R.N. Whybray恰当地评论道:“如果本·塞拉认为在他的作品中加入一个‘史学’部分很重要的话——
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“Our Forefathers Never Triumphed by Arms…” Abraham and His Offspring in the Pauline Writings Theological Hermeneutics and Historical Motifs in Pss 105-106 The Function of History in Early Rabbinic Liturgy Stephen’s Speech Before the Sanhedrin Against the Background of the Summaries of the History of Israel (Acts 7)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1