Estudio comparativo de rendimientos empresariales de hombres y mujeres en México: una aproximación empírica

Pablo Daniel Palacios-Duarte, María Luisa Saavedra-García, María del Rosario Cortés-Castillo
{"title":"Estudio comparativo de rendimientos empresariales de hombres y mujeres en México: una aproximación empírica","authors":"Pablo Daniel Palacios-Duarte, María Luisa Saavedra-García, María del Rosario Cortés-Castillo","doi":"10.14718/REVFINANZPOLITECON.V12.N2.2020.3375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to compare the income performance of entrepreneurs, in order to determine whether there are differences in the returns of men- and women-led businesses, as well as to identify what factors drive women’s entrepreneurship. The study used the database of the National Household Income and Expenditure Survey (INEGI, 2017), from which a sample of 296 women and 430 men was obtained. A Probiteconometric model was estimated using the methodology proposed by Heckman, Tobias, and Vytalcil (2000; 2001) through a two-stage process, which included household type, company size, age, experience, and income as independent variables, while income performance by company was used as dependent variable. The main findings make it clear that the returns of women-led companies are lower than those directedby men, and that women generally undertake an enterprise out of necessity.","PeriodicalId":377256,"journal":{"name":"Revista Finanzas y Política Económica","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Finanzas y Política Económica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14718/REVFINANZPOLITECON.V12.N2.2020.3375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This research aims to compare the income performance of entrepreneurs, in order to determine whether there are differences in the returns of men- and women-led businesses, as well as to identify what factors drive women’s entrepreneurship. The study used the database of the National Household Income and Expenditure Survey (INEGI, 2017), from which a sample of 296 women and 430 men was obtained. A Probiteconometric model was estimated using the methodology proposed by Heckman, Tobias, and Vytalcil (2000; 2001) through a two-stage process, which included household type, company size, age, experience, and income as independent variables, while income performance by company was used as dependent variable. The main findings make it clear that the returns of women-led companies are lower than those directedby men, and that women generally undertake an enterprise out of necessity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
墨西哥男性和女性创业绩效的比较研究:实证方法
本研究旨在比较企业家的收入表现,以确定男性和女性领导的企业的回报是否存在差异,并确定推动女性创业的因素。该研究使用了国家家庭收入和支出调查(INEGI, 2017)的数据库,从中获得了296名女性和430名男性的样本。使用Heckman, Tobias和Vytalcil(2000)提出的方法估计Probiteconometric模型;以家庭类型、公司规模、年龄、经验和收入为自变量,以公司收入绩效为因变量。主要调查结果清楚地表明,女性领导的公司的回报率低于男性领导的公司,而且女性通常出于必要而从事企业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Endeudamiento público municipal en México en el periodo 2009-2021: los efectos de las reformas legales y la pandemia por covid-19 Análisis de la eficiencia del mercado de acciones chileno Efecto de la liberación comercial sobre el mercado de trabajo y la pobreza en el sector de las confecciones en Colombia Brechas de género y gobernanzas criminales del narcotráfico en Latinoamérica Factores del sistema tributario argentino: ¿incentivo o desincentivo a la informalidad empresarial? Percepción de los comerciantes y contadores públicos
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1