On the robustness of association rules

P. Lenca, B. Vaillant, S. Lallich
{"title":"On the robustness of association rules","authors":"P. Lenca, B. Vaillant, S. Lallich","doi":"10.1109/ICCIS.2006.252282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Association rules discovery is one of the most important tasks in knowledge discovery in data bases. The rules produced with a priori-like algorithms are then usually used for decision aiding in expert and knowledge based systems and/or by a human end user. Unfortunately such algorithms may produce huge amounts of rules and thus one of the most important steps in association rules discovery nowadays is the evaluation and the interpretation of their interestingness. Objective measures provide numerical information on the quality of a rule and a rule is said \"of quality\" if its evaluation by a measure is greater than a user defined threshold. In this paper we propose a new specificity of association rule objective interestingness measures: the threshold sensitivity. By dealing with this problem we intend to provide means of measuring the strength/robustness of the interest of a rule. We propose a general framework allowing us to determine the number of examples that a rule can lose while remaining acceptable, for a panel of classical measures that are transformation of the confidence","PeriodicalId":296028,"journal":{"name":"2006 IEEE Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent Systems","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2006 IEEE Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIS.2006.252282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Association rules discovery is one of the most important tasks in knowledge discovery in data bases. The rules produced with a priori-like algorithms are then usually used for decision aiding in expert and knowledge based systems and/or by a human end user. Unfortunately such algorithms may produce huge amounts of rules and thus one of the most important steps in association rules discovery nowadays is the evaluation and the interpretation of their interestingness. Objective measures provide numerical information on the quality of a rule and a rule is said "of quality" if its evaluation by a measure is greater than a user defined threshold. In this paper we propose a new specificity of association rule objective interestingness measures: the threshold sensitivity. By dealing with this problem we intend to provide means of measuring the strength/robustness of the interest of a rule. We propose a general framework allowing us to determine the number of examples that a rule can lose while remaining acceptable, for a panel of classical measures that are transformation of the confidence
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关联规则的鲁棒性
关联规则发现是数据库知识发现的重要任务之一。然后,由类似优先级的算法生成的规则通常用于基于专家和知识的系统和/或人类最终用户的决策辅助。不幸的是,这种算法可能会产生大量的规则,因此当今关联规则发现中最重要的步骤之一是评估和解释它们的有趣性。客观度量提供关于规则质量的数字信息,如果度量对规则的评价大于用户定义的阈值,则将规则称为“质量”。本文提出了一种新的关联规则客观兴趣度度量的特异性:阈值敏感性。通过处理这个问题,我们打算提供衡量规则利益的强度/稳健性的方法。我们提出了一个一般框架,使我们能够确定规则在保持可接受的情况下可以失去的示例数,用于一组经典措施,这些措施是信心的转换
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Multi-layer Control Strategy of Dynamics Control System of Vehicle A Fuzzy Multiple Critera Decision Making Method Gait Recognition Considering Directions of Walking Nonlinear Diffusion Driven by Local Features for Image Denoising Designing of an Adaptive Adcock Array and Reducing the Effects of Other Transmitters, Unwanted Reflections and Noise
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1