You shall know a term by the company it keeps: collocations of the term evidence in general and legal corpora

{"title":"You shall know a term by the company it keeps: collocations of the term evidence in general and legal corpora","authors":"","doi":"10.26881/bp.2022.1.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the progress made in the study of collocations, their use in specialised languages by and large continues to be underresearched. The present article attempts to go some way towards filling this gap by looking at variation in collocations of a single term (evidence) as extracted from a general corpus and a legal one, and by exploring the implications of such variation for the retrieval of legal collocations. In particular, the study looks at a) the overrepresentation of collocations in the legal corpus, b) the underrepresentation of collocations in the legal corpus, and c) the potential of both corpora for collocation retrieval. The findings suggest that there are striking differences between the use of collocations in each corpus and that such differences can radically affect the lists of collocations obtained from each corpus.","PeriodicalId":345953,"journal":{"name":"Beyond Philology An International Journal of Linguistics, Literary Studies and English Language Teaching","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Beyond Philology An International Journal of Linguistics, Literary Studies and English Language Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26881/bp.2022.1.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Despite the progress made in the study of collocations, their use in specialised languages by and large continues to be underresearched. The present article attempts to go some way towards filling this gap by looking at variation in collocations of a single term (evidence) as extracted from a general corpus and a legal one, and by exploring the implications of such variation for the retrieval of legal collocations. In particular, the study looks at a) the overrepresentation of collocations in the legal corpus, b) the underrepresentation of collocations in the legal corpus, and c) the potential of both corpora for collocation retrieval. The findings suggest that there are striking differences between the use of collocations in each corpus and that such differences can radically affect the lists of collocations obtained from each corpus.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
你应该知道它所保留的一个术语:“一般证据”和“法律语料库”这两个术语的搭配
尽管对搭配的研究取得了进展,但它们在专业语言中的使用总体上仍未得到充分研究。本文试图通过观察从一般语料库和法律语料库中提取的单个术语(证据)的搭配变化,并通过探索这种变化对法律搭配检索的影响,在某种程度上填补这一空白。特别地,该研究着眼于a)法律语料库中搭配的过度代表性,b)法律语料库中搭配的代表性不足,以及c)两个语料库在搭配检索方面的潜力。研究结果表明,每个语料库中搭配使用之间存在显著差异,这种差异可以从根本上影响从每个语料库中获得的搭配列表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Taboo zoonyms: What do 'bear', 'lynx' and 'wolf' have in common? Taboo zoonyms: What do 'bear', 'lynx' and 'wolf' have in common? Circumlocutions with the noun guy in Hawai’i Creole English Fostering an autonomous approach as a key to successful remote learning during the covid pandemic Cross-linguistic phonological interaction: Word-stress usage in the English of Polish advanced EFL speakers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1