Comparing Two Strategies for Locating Hydrogen Refueling Stations under High Demand Uncertainty

D. Thiel
{"title":"Comparing Two Strategies for Locating Hydrogen Refueling Stations under High Demand Uncertainty","authors":"D. Thiel","doi":"10.21926/aeer.2302031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to model and compare two strategies for locating new hydrogen refueling stations (HRS) in a context of high uncertainty on H2 demand and on the spatial distribution of demand points. The first strategy S1 represented by an agent-based model integrating a particle swarm optimization metaheuristic consists of finding the best HRS locations by adapting to the real evolution of the demand. A second strategy S2 consists in solving a classical capacitated p-median problem based on H2 consumption forecasts over a given deterministic horizon in order to define in advance p optimal future HRS locations. Assuming that the same distributor gradually implements future HRSs in a given area between 2023 and 2030, both models minimize the sum of travel distances between each demand point and its assigned SRH. The results show that during the growth phase of the fuel cell electric vehicle (FCEV) market, with two different compound annual growth rates (medium and strong), the conservative S1 strategy performs better than S2 as these rates increase. However, while S2 remains suboptimal throughout the sales growth period, it becomes more effective once demand stabilizes. Another finding is that different uniform distributions of H2 demand points in the same space have only a small long-term influence on the performance of these two models. This research advises investors to study the influence of different location strategies and models on the performance of a final HRS network in a given region. Models can be easily configured and adapted to a particular spatial distribution of demand points in a specific environment, more flexible H2 production capabilities, or different behaviors of FCEV drivers that could be geo-located.","PeriodicalId":198785,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Environmental and Engineering Research","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Environmental and Engineering Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21926/aeer.2302031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research aims to model and compare two strategies for locating new hydrogen refueling stations (HRS) in a context of high uncertainty on H2 demand and on the spatial distribution of demand points. The first strategy S1 represented by an agent-based model integrating a particle swarm optimization metaheuristic consists of finding the best HRS locations by adapting to the real evolution of the demand. A second strategy S2 consists in solving a classical capacitated p-median problem based on H2 consumption forecasts over a given deterministic horizon in order to define in advance p optimal future HRS locations. Assuming that the same distributor gradually implements future HRSs in a given area between 2023 and 2030, both models minimize the sum of travel distances between each demand point and its assigned SRH. The results show that during the growth phase of the fuel cell electric vehicle (FCEV) market, with two different compound annual growth rates (medium and strong), the conservative S1 strategy performs better than S2 as these rates increase. However, while S2 remains suboptimal throughout the sales growth period, it becomes more effective once demand stabilizes. Another finding is that different uniform distributions of H2 demand points in the same space have only a small long-term influence on the performance of these two models. This research advises investors to study the influence of different location strategies and models on the performance of a final HRS network in a given region. Models can be easily configured and adapted to a particular spatial distribution of demand points in a specific environment, more flexible H2 production capabilities, or different behaviors of FCEV drivers that could be geo-located.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高需求不确定性条件下加氢站定位的两种策略比较
本研究旨在模拟和比较在氢气需求和需求点空间分布高度不确定的背景下,定位新加氢站(HRS)的两种策略。第一种策略S1是基于智能体模型,结合粒子群优化元启发式算法,通过适应需求的真实演变,找到最佳的HRS位置。第二种策略S2包括解决一个经典的基于H2消耗预测的p中值问题,以便提前定义p个最优的未来HRS位置。假设同一经销商在2023年至2030年间在给定区域逐步实施未来的SRH,两个模型都最小化每个需求点与其分配的SRH之间的行程距离总和。结果表明,在燃料电池电动汽车(FCEV)市场的成长阶段,在两种不同的复合年增长率(中等和强劲)下,随着复合年增长率的增加,保守的S1策略表现优于S2策略。然而,尽管S2在整个销售增长期间仍然不是最理想的,但一旦需求稳定下来,它就会变得更加有效。另一个发现是,同一空间H2需求点的不同均匀分布对这两种模型的性能只有很小的长期影响。本研究建议投资者研究不同的区位策略和模型对特定区域内最终HRS网络绩效的影响。模型可以很容易地配置和适应特定环境中需求点的特定空间分布,更灵活的氢气生产能力,或者可以地理定位的FCEV驾驶员的不同行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cultural Eutrophication Impacts on New River in Northern Belize: A Community Capitals Assessment Phytoremediation: A Sustainable Approach to Combat Soil Salinity Human Health Impact of Municipal Solid Waste Mismanagement: A Review Application of Simulation-Based Metrics to Improve the Daylight Performance of a Secondary School, An Approach for Green Building Designers and Architects Estimating Inhaled Nitrogen Dioxide from the Human Biometric Response
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1