Machine Learning for Facies Distribution of Large Carbonate Reservoir Models- A Case Study

Frederic Robail, S. Sanyal, Ahmad Nazmi B M Noor Azudin, Kwi Yen Koh, Farahani Bt Hairon Nizar, Ummi Farah Mohamad Rosli
{"title":"Machine Learning for Facies Distribution of Large Carbonate Reservoir Models- A Case Study","authors":"Frederic Robail, S. Sanyal, Ahmad Nazmi B M Noor Azudin, Kwi Yen Koh, Farahani Bt Hairon Nizar, Ummi Farah Mohamad Rosli","doi":"10.2523/iptc-22876-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Multibillion barrels oil in-place carbonate reservoirs have their unique static and dynamic modelling challenges due to the nature of the reservoir with both vertical and lateral heterogeneities. The complex geological processes which took place both during and after the deposition, results in the heterogeneity, which are reflected in the reservoir characterization of these large-scale carbonate reservoirs. Capturing the geological facies variability in the reservoir description is thus one of the critical elements to ensure the model's validity, robustness, and forecasting ability.\n This case study exemplifies the use of a machine learning approach to tackle this subsurface complexity within a multidisciplinary integrated study to construct a field scale reservoir model for a large carbonate reservoir.\n The carbonate field has recently acquired additional core data in several newly drilled wells. These cores have been described by sedimentologists to define reservoir depositional facies and lithofacies. This geological description has been used by a machine learning algorithm to train the conventional triple combo logs to recognize the reservoir facies. The training of the facies definitions at the cored wells were also conditioned to the sequence stratigraphic correlation framework of the reservoir. Later these geological facies have been propagated using logs to more than 80 un-cored wells to provide facies predictions within a geological context.\n The result from the machine learning algorithm gives an excellent replication rate on the cored wells. It is also robust on the un-cored wells throughout the field. This robustness of the facies definitions has been verified using production / injection log survey (PLT / ILT), core CT-Scan and core descriptions. Firstly, for the cored wells, the production / injection zones identified by PLT surveys clearly correspond to the best reservoir facies. Secondly, in the un-cored wells, the best facies predicted by the machine learning algorithm correspond to the production / injection zones interpreted from the production and injection logging surveys (PLT survey)\n The predicted geological facies in both cored and un-cored wells and seismic inversion trends were used to condition the 3D distribution of the facies in the reservoir model. The use of machine learning for facies prediction has also helped to validate the underlying geological concept of an older good quality reservoir interval in certain areas of the field, which were not adequately sampled from the existing core data.\n In the future, the machine learning based reservoir models will be used to identify new infill locations where \"best producing\" facies are likely to be present.","PeriodicalId":153269,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Thu, March 02, 2023","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Thu, March 02, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-22876-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multibillion barrels oil in-place carbonate reservoirs have their unique static and dynamic modelling challenges due to the nature of the reservoir with both vertical and lateral heterogeneities. The complex geological processes which took place both during and after the deposition, results in the heterogeneity, which are reflected in the reservoir characterization of these large-scale carbonate reservoirs. Capturing the geological facies variability in the reservoir description is thus one of the critical elements to ensure the model's validity, robustness, and forecasting ability. This case study exemplifies the use of a machine learning approach to tackle this subsurface complexity within a multidisciplinary integrated study to construct a field scale reservoir model for a large carbonate reservoir. The carbonate field has recently acquired additional core data in several newly drilled wells. These cores have been described by sedimentologists to define reservoir depositional facies and lithofacies. This geological description has been used by a machine learning algorithm to train the conventional triple combo logs to recognize the reservoir facies. The training of the facies definitions at the cored wells were also conditioned to the sequence stratigraphic correlation framework of the reservoir. Later these geological facies have been propagated using logs to more than 80 un-cored wells to provide facies predictions within a geological context. The result from the machine learning algorithm gives an excellent replication rate on the cored wells. It is also robust on the un-cored wells throughout the field. This robustness of the facies definitions has been verified using production / injection log survey (PLT / ILT), core CT-Scan and core descriptions. Firstly, for the cored wells, the production / injection zones identified by PLT surveys clearly correspond to the best reservoir facies. Secondly, in the un-cored wells, the best facies predicted by the machine learning algorithm correspond to the production / injection zones interpreted from the production and injection logging surveys (PLT survey) The predicted geological facies in both cored and un-cored wells and seismic inversion trends were used to condition the 3D distribution of the facies in the reservoir model. The use of machine learning for facies prediction has also helped to validate the underlying geological concept of an older good quality reservoir interval in certain areas of the field, which were not adequately sampled from the existing core data. In the future, the machine learning based reservoir models will be used to identify new infill locations where "best producing" facies are likely to be present.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大型碳酸盐储层模型相分布的机器学习-案例研究
由于储层具有垂直和横向非均质性,数十亿桶的碳酸盐岩油藏在静态和动态建模方面面临着独特的挑战。沉积过程中和沉积后的复杂地质作用导致了储层的非均质性,反映在这些大型碳酸盐岩储层的储层特征上。因此,在储层描述中捕捉地质相变化是确保模型有效性、稳健性和预测能力的关键因素之一。本案例展示了在多学科综合研究中使用机器学习方法来解决地下复杂性问题,为大型碳酸盐岩储层构建现场规模的储层模型。该碳酸盐岩油田最近在几口新钻的井中获得了额外的岩心数据。沉积学家对这些岩心进行了描述,以确定储层沉积相和岩相。该地质描述已被机器学习算法用于训练常规三重组合测井,以识别储层相。取心井的相定义训练也受储层层序地层对比格架的制约。随后,这些地质相通过测井传播到80多口未取心井,以提供地质背景下的相预测。机器学习算法的结果在取心井上具有出色的复制率。它在整个油田的未取心井中也很稳定。这种相定义的稳健性已经通过生产/注入测井测量(PLT / ILT)、岩心ct扫描和岩心描述进行了验证。首先,对于取心井,通过PLT测量确定的生产/注入区明显对应于最佳储层相。其次,在未取心井中,机器学习算法预测的最佳相对应于从生产和注入测井调查(PLT)中解释的生产/注入层。在取心井和未取心井中预测的地质相以及地震反演趋势用于调节储层模型中相的三维分布。使用机器学习进行相预测也有助于验证油田某些地区较老的优质储层的潜在地质概念,这些区域没有从现有的岩心数据中充分取样。未来,基于机器学习的储层模型将用于识别可能存在“最佳生产”相的新填充位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Advancement of Open Hole Gravel Pack and Zonal Isolation with Selective Intelligent Completion in Deepwater Malaysia Reaching Beyond the Limit, the Furthest Step Out S Shape Wells in Deep Gas Well Project Application and Performance Monitoring of Compound Air Plasma Lightning Rejection System Malaysia's First Use of Subsea Release Plug System for Dual Barrier Offline Cementing (DBOC) Across Hydrocarbon Section Helps Streamline Activities Drilling Weak Formations in Rumaila Field in Southern Iraq — Modelling Shear Failure Using Numerical Models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1