BİR ÖLÇEK GELİŞTİRME ÇALIŞMASI: HASTA MAHREMİYET ÖLÇEĞİ

Vesile Eski̇ci̇, Ayşegül Yayla, Zeynep KARAMAN ÖZLÜ
{"title":"BİR ÖLÇEK GELİŞTİRME ÇALIŞMASI: HASTA MAHREMİYET ÖLÇEĞİ","authors":"Vesile Eski̇ci̇, Ayşegül Yayla, Zeynep KARAMAN ÖZLÜ","doi":"10.52831/kjhs.1137632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study was carried out to develop a patient privacy scale to determine patients' thoughts on protection of their privacy at the hospital. \nMethods: The study is a methodological study. This study was carried out between January and August 2020 with patients hospitalized in except pediatric clincs, the surgical and internal medicine clinics in a university hospital in an eastern province in Turkey. The “patient privacy draft scale” (HPS) was used as a data collection tool. The study was conducted with a total of 318 patients hospitalized in 150 surgical wards and 168 in internal wards. \nResults: The draft scale consisting of 33 items and 4 sub-dimensions (perception of privacy, protection of privacy, environment privacy and privacy awareness) prepared by the researchers in line with the literature was submitted for evaluation by experts through providing their opinions, and as a result of the evaluation, one item Content Validity Index (CVI) less than .30 was removed from the scale, and the draft scale was reduced to 32 items. According to the expert opinions, the CVI of the scale was = .90. The value of Cronbach's Alpha was 0.915. An explanatory factor analysis was performed for construct validity; the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) value of the scale was 0.914, and the Bartlett test's result was χ2 = 2636.728 (p = 0.000). The four-factor scale structure, which was designed by explanatory and confirmatory factor analysis in line with validity and reliability studies, was verified. Items with a factor load value below 0.30 were removed from the scale, and according to the analysis results obtained, the patient privacy scale took its final form with 18 items and 4 subdimensions (perception of privacy, protection of privacy, environmental privacy, and privacy awareness). \nConclusion: This scale is a valid and reliable tool that can be used in the assessment of patient privacy in a hospital.","PeriodicalId":212263,"journal":{"name":"Karya Journal of Health Science","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Karya Journal of Health Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52831/kjhs.1137632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study was carried out to develop a patient privacy scale to determine patients' thoughts on protection of their privacy at the hospital. Methods: The study is a methodological study. This study was carried out between January and August 2020 with patients hospitalized in except pediatric clincs, the surgical and internal medicine clinics in a university hospital in an eastern province in Turkey. The “patient privacy draft scale” (HPS) was used as a data collection tool. The study was conducted with a total of 318 patients hospitalized in 150 surgical wards and 168 in internal wards. Results: The draft scale consisting of 33 items and 4 sub-dimensions (perception of privacy, protection of privacy, environment privacy and privacy awareness) prepared by the researchers in line with the literature was submitted for evaluation by experts through providing their opinions, and as a result of the evaluation, one item Content Validity Index (CVI) less than .30 was removed from the scale, and the draft scale was reduced to 32 items. According to the expert opinions, the CVI of the scale was = .90. The value of Cronbach's Alpha was 0.915. An explanatory factor analysis was performed for construct validity; the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) value of the scale was 0.914, and the Bartlett test's result was χ2 = 2636.728 (p = 0.000). The four-factor scale structure, which was designed by explanatory and confirmatory factor analysis in line with validity and reliability studies, was verified. Items with a factor load value below 0.30 were removed from the scale, and according to the analysis results obtained, the patient privacy scale took its final form with 18 items and 4 subdimensions (perception of privacy, protection of privacy, environmental privacy, and privacy awareness). Conclusion: This scale is a valid and reliable tool that can be used in the assessment of patient privacy in a hospital.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
目的:本研究编制患者隐私量表,以了解患者在医院对隐私保护的看法。方法:本研究为方法学研究。本研究于2020年1月至8月期间在土耳其东部省份的一所大学医院的儿科诊所、外科和内科诊所住院的患者中进行。采用“患者隐私草稿量表”(HPS)作为数据收集工具。研究对象为318例住院患者,分别为150个外科病房和168个内科病房。结果:研究者根据文献编制的由33个条目和4个子维度(隐私感知、隐私保护、环境隐私和隐私意识)组成的量表初稿通过专家提供意见的方式提交给专家进行评估,评估结果将小于0.30的一个条目内容效度指数(Content Validity Index, CVI)从量表中剔除,量表初稿缩减为32个条目。根据专家意见,量表的CVI值为= 0.90。Cronbach’s Alpha值为0.915。对构念效度进行解释因子分析;量表的KMO值为0.914,Bartlett检验结果χ2 = 2636.728 (p = 0.000)。根据效度和信度研究,通过解释性因子分析和验证性因子分析设计的四因子量表结构进行验证。剔除因子负荷值在0.30以下的条目,根据分析结果,最终形成患者隐私量表,共有18个条目和4个子维度(隐私感知、隐私保护、环境隐私和隐私意识)。结论:该量表是一种有效、可靠的工具,可用于医院患者隐私评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Incentive Spirometry and Oscillatory Positive Expiratory Pressure Therapies on Functional Capacity, Dyspnea, and Saturation in Burn Patients with Inhalation Injury: A Randomized Controlled Study THE EFFECT OF DIGITAL GAME ADDICTION ON AGGRESSION IN SCHOOLAGE CHILDREN Kronik Boyun Ağrısında Servikal Stabilizasyon Egzersizleri ile Kombine Edilen Mulligan Mobilizasyon Tekniğinin Etkilerinin Tek Başına Servikal Stabilizasyon Egzersizlerinin Etkileri ile Karşılaştırılması: Randomize Kontrollü Çalışma LAPAROSKOPİK SLEEVE GASTREKTOMİ SONRASI BESLENME KALİTESİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ İNMELİ HASTALARDA EKSPİRATUAR KAS EĞİTİMİNİN STOMATOGNATİK SİSTEME ETKİSİ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1