Vitarebiti brunvis gamoxatvisatvis qartuli enis taour dialeqtshi /ვითარებითი ბრუნვის გამოხატვისათვის ქართული ენის ტაოურ დიალექტში [Expressing Adverbial Case in Tao Dialect of the Georgian Language]

Eka Dadiani
{"title":"Vitarebiti brunvis gamoxatvisatvis qartuli enis taour dialeqtshi /ვითარებითი ბრუნვის გამოხატვისათვის ქართული ენის ტაოურ დიალექტში [Expressing Adverbial Case in Tao Dialect of the Georgian Language]","authors":"Eka Dadiani","doi":"10.54635/tpks.2022.07putk","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The adverbial case in the speech of the Georgians of Tao is mainly formed by the allomorphs that are characteristic of the Georgian literary language and the dialects. However, the frequency of their occurrence is rather different. The -a suffix is the most common one, to which in some cases -i/-y is added. The occurrences of the variants that include d/t consonant (-ad/-at/-d/-t) are relatively rare. It is noteworthy that as an alternative to the adverbial case, the forms of the nominative case or postpositional forms (-ze, -baaze/barze) are quite frequently represented, which are less common in other dialects. The adverbial case forms primarily manifest manner and purpose, while the expression of time and place is relatively uncommon. Almost no occurrences of translative and sequential functions have been attested.\nWe believe, the above-mentioned facts refer to the weakening of the position of the adverbial case in the Taoian dialect which could be explained by the influence of the Turkish language; there is no adverbial case in Turkish, mainly the nominative or dative forms are applied to express the relevant content. The use of the nominative case or postpositional forms as having the adverbial function is not uncommon in Georgian either, however, its activation in those constructions where the adverbial case is established in Georgian, should have been driven by close contact with the Turkish language. This is evidenced by the data of Laz, the Kartvelian subsystem functioning within the sphere of Turkish. Currently, there is no adverbial case in Laz (its function is performed by the nominative case), though historically it should have occurred here.\nIn terms of expressing the adverbial case, the Taoian dialect exhibits common Georgian tendencies, on the one hand, and those changes that emerge as a result of bilingualism, on the other.\nსაკვანძო სიტყვები: ქართული დიალექტოლოგია, ტაოური დიალექტი, სახელის ფორმაწარმოება, ვითარებითი ბრუნვა.Keywords: Georgian dialectology, Taoian dialect, formation of nominals, adverbial case.","PeriodicalId":272679,"journal":{"name":"Kartveluri Memk'vidreoba [Kartvelian Heritage]","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kartveluri Memk'vidreoba [Kartvelian Heritage]","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54635/tpks.2022.07putk","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The adverbial case in the speech of the Georgians of Tao is mainly formed by the allomorphs that are characteristic of the Georgian literary language and the dialects. However, the frequency of their occurrence is rather different. The -a suffix is the most common one, to which in some cases -i/-y is added. The occurrences of the variants that include d/t consonant (-ad/-at/-d/-t) are relatively rare. It is noteworthy that as an alternative to the adverbial case, the forms of the nominative case or postpositional forms (-ze, -baaze/barze) are quite frequently represented, which are less common in other dialects. The adverbial case forms primarily manifest manner and purpose, while the expression of time and place is relatively uncommon. Almost no occurrences of translative and sequential functions have been attested. We believe, the above-mentioned facts refer to the weakening of the position of the adverbial case in the Taoian dialect which could be explained by the influence of the Turkish language; there is no adverbial case in Turkish, mainly the nominative or dative forms are applied to express the relevant content. The use of the nominative case or postpositional forms as having the adverbial function is not uncommon in Georgian either, however, its activation in those constructions where the adverbial case is established in Georgian, should have been driven by close contact with the Turkish language. This is evidenced by the data of Laz, the Kartvelian subsystem functioning within the sphere of Turkish. Currently, there is no adverbial case in Laz (its function is performed by the nominative case), though historically it should have occurred here. In terms of expressing the adverbial case, the Taoian dialect exhibits common Georgian tendencies, on the one hand, and those changes that emerge as a result of bilingualism, on the other. საკვანძო სიტყვები: ქართული დიალექტოლოგია, ტაოური დიალექტი, სახელის ფორმაწარმოება, ვითარებითი ბრუნვა.Keywords: Georgian dialectology, Taoian dialect, formation of nominals, adverbial case.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
格鲁吉亚道人言语中的状语格主要由格鲁吉亚文学语言和方言的异构体构成。然而,它们发生的频率却大不相同。-a后缀是最常见的后缀,在某些情况下会加上-i/-y。包含d/t辅音的变体(-ad/-at/-d/-t)的出现相对较少。值得注意的是,作为状语格的替代形式,主格形式或后置形式(-ze, -baaze/barze)在其他方言中很少出现。状语格主要表现方式和目的,时间和地点的表达相对少见。几乎没有发现平移和顺序函数。我们认为,上述事实是指在桃语方言中状语地位的弱化,这可以用土耳其语的影响来解释;土耳其语中没有状语格,主要是用主格或加格形式来表达相关内容。主格或后置形式作为状语的使用在格鲁吉亚语中也并不罕见,然而,在格鲁吉亚语中建立状语的结构中,它的激活应该是由与土耳其语的密切接触所驱动的。这是由拉兹的数据证明的,卡特维利亚子系统在土耳其领域内运作。目前,拉兹语中没有状语格(它的功能是由主格来完成的),尽管从历史上看,拉兹语中应该有状语格。在状语格的表达上,洮方言一方面表现出格鲁吉亚语的共同倾向,另一方面也表现出双语化的变化。საკვანძოსიტყვები:ქართულიდიალექტოლოგია,ტაოურიდიალექტი,სახელისფორმაწარმოება,ვითარებითიბრუნვა。关键词:格鲁吉亚方言,洮方言,名词法,状语格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Simbolist’uri kalakis mxat’vrul-msoplmxedvelobrivi ret’rosp’ekt’iva Sandro cirekidzis miniat’urebshi /სიმბოლისტური ქალაქის მხატვრულ-მსოფლმხედველობრივი რეტროსპექტივა სანდრო ცირეკიძის მინიატურებში [Artistic-Worldview Retrospective of Symbolist Сity in Miniatures by Sandro Tsirekidze] C’anarta c’armomavlobisatvis /წანართა წარმომავლობისათვის [For the Structure of The Noun c̕anar] Kartveluri Memk'vidreoba [Kartvelian Heritage] P’olipunkciuri –d kartulshi da ughvlilebis morposint’aksuri modelebi /პოლიფუნქციური -დ- ქართულში და უღვლილების მორფოსინტაქსური მოდელები [Polyfunctional -d- in Georgian and Morphosyntactic Models of Conjugation] T’ransregionuli da regionuli maksimebi da enatmecniereba (kartuli samc’ignobro enis sivrce) /ტრანსრეგიონული და რეგიონული მაქსიმები და ენათმეცნიერება (ქართული სამწიგნობრო ენის სივრცე) [Transregional and Regional Maxims and Linguistics (Georgian Literary Language Space)]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1