The Impact of Case Law on the Duty of Trust and Confidence in the English Legal System

Munachiso Ogu-Jude
{"title":"The Impact of Case Law on the Duty of Trust and Confidence in the English Legal System","authors":"Munachiso Ogu-Jude","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3575500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is now established in employment law that an implied term of trust and confidence exists in the contract of employment which subjects’ parties to a duty not to conduct themselves without reason in such manner that will likely destroy or damage the existing trust and confidence between them. This duty developed from the duty of cooperation and has since assumed a central role in the contract of employment. Constructive dismissal under the Industrial Relations Act 1971 enhanced the popularity of the implied term of trust and confidence since it requires an employee to demonstrate that a contract was repudiated due to an employer’s breach of the contract. <br><br>Despite it being a mutual obligation on both parties, its effect on the employer has raised more issues in the courts than that on the employee. This may be based on the public view that employees are the weaker party in the contract and as such should be protected. On the other hand, an employer may use this implied term as a defence for dismissing an employee without notice.<br><br>Case-law has played an important role in the development of the employer’s duty of trust and confidence and parliament is yet to put in place a statute to constrain it or set out guidelines for its further development . There have been many arguments on the origin of the mutual trust and confidence. However most courts and employment tribunals have adopted the principle in Woods v W.M. Car Services (Peterborough) Ltd where Browne-Wilkinson J stated that “….employers will not without reasonable and proper cause, conduct themselves in a manner calculated or likely to destroy or seriously damage the relationship of confidence and trust between employer and employee.” <br><br>In this paper, the discussion shall be firstly, how the courts have extended or limited the scope of the employer’s duty of trust and confidence since Woods v W.M. Car Services and secondly factors which may affect the further development of the employer’s duty of trust and confidence. <br>","PeriodicalId":174628,"journal":{"name":"English Law: Business (Topic)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English Law: Business (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3575500","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is now established in employment law that an implied term of trust and confidence exists in the contract of employment which subjects’ parties to a duty not to conduct themselves without reason in such manner that will likely destroy or damage the existing trust and confidence between them. This duty developed from the duty of cooperation and has since assumed a central role in the contract of employment. Constructive dismissal under the Industrial Relations Act 1971 enhanced the popularity of the implied term of trust and confidence since it requires an employee to demonstrate that a contract was repudiated due to an employer’s breach of the contract.

Despite it being a mutual obligation on both parties, its effect on the employer has raised more issues in the courts than that on the employee. This may be based on the public view that employees are the weaker party in the contract and as such should be protected. On the other hand, an employer may use this implied term as a defence for dismissing an employee without notice.

Case-law has played an important role in the development of the employer’s duty of trust and confidence and parliament is yet to put in place a statute to constrain it or set out guidelines for its further development . There have been many arguments on the origin of the mutual trust and confidence. However most courts and employment tribunals have adopted the principle in Woods v W.M. Car Services (Peterborough) Ltd where Browne-Wilkinson J stated that “….employers will not without reasonable and proper cause, conduct themselves in a manner calculated or likely to destroy or seriously damage the relationship of confidence and trust between employer and employee.”

In this paper, the discussion shall be firstly, how the courts have extended or limited the scope of the employer’s duty of trust and confidence since Woods v W.M. Car Services and secondly factors which may affect the further development of the employer’s duty of trust and confidence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
判例法对英国法系信任与信任义务的影响
现在就业法规定,雇佣合同中存在一个默示的信任和信心条款,使双方当事人有义务不无故地作出可能破坏或损害他们之间现有信任和信心的行为。这一义务从合作义务发展而来,并从此在雇佣合同中起了核心作用。1971年《劳资关系法》规定的建设性解雇提高了“信任和信心”这一隐含条款的受欢迎程度,因为它要求雇员证明,由于雇主违反合同,合同被撤销。尽管这是双方共同的义务,但它对雇主的影响比对雇员的影响在法庭上引发了更多的问题。这可能是基于公众认为员工是合同中较弱的一方,因此应该受到保护。另一方面,雇主可使用此隐含用语作为不经通知而解雇雇员的抗辩理由。判例法在发展雇主的信任和信任义务方面发挥了重要作用,议会尚未制定一项法规对其加以限制或为其进一步发展制定指导方针。关于相互信任和信心的起源,一直有很多争论。然而,大多数法院和就业法庭在伍兹诉W.M.汽车服务(彼得伯勒)有限公司案中采用了这一原则,其中布朗-威尔金森律师事务所表示:“....雇主在没有合理和正当理由的情况下,不会故意或可能破坏或严重损害雇主与雇员之间的信任关系。”本文首先讨论的是,自伍兹诉W.M.汽车服务公司案以来,法院是如何扩大或限制雇主信任和保密义务的范围的,其次是可能影响雇主信任和保密义务进一步发展的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
COVID-19: Assessing Some Potential Global Economic, Business and Legal Impacts The Pursuit to Defeat Underwriter Opportunism: A Comparative Analysis of Combating Misconduct in the Claims Process The Impact of Case Law on the Duty of Trust and Confidence in the English Legal System Parent Company Direct Liability for Overseas Human Rights Violations: Lessons from the UK Supreme Court Applying Economics to the Internet: Can Regulators and Competition Authorities Keep Pace?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1