Analyzing R&D projects on health products

Eduardo Pinheiro Gondim de Vasconcellos , Sérgio Nunes Muritiba , Sally Muller Affonso Prado , Mary Dalva Caparroz Vancetto , Patricia Morilha Muritiba
{"title":"Analyzing R&D projects on health products","authors":"Eduardo Pinheiro Gondim de Vasconcellos ,&nbsp;Sérgio Nunes Muritiba ,&nbsp;Sally Muller Affonso Prado ,&nbsp;Mary Dalva Caparroz Vancetto ,&nbsp;Patricia Morilha Muritiba","doi":"10.1016/j.rai.2016.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The resources invested in research do not guarantee an immediate practical application. Companies and government increasingly seek mechanisms for prioritizing R&amp;D projects appropriately when resources are insufficient. This study's objective was to develop and present a methodology used to evaluate the portfolio of research and help choosing the best investments in research. This methodology was applied at the Butanta Institute, in Brazil, an organization responsible for researching and developing, among other medicines, vaccines and other chemicals, Onco BCG, a medication for the treatment of bladder cancer. In the article, we present and analyze the methodology used at Butanta Institute. Conclusions show that literature on R&amp;D portfolio management advises the use of risk and return criteria, when choosing among projects. In the case study of Butanta, the methodology of choice was based more on the customer's perspective.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101056,"journal":{"name":"RAI Revista de Administra??o e Inova??o","volume":"13 3","pages":"Pages 199-210"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rai.2016.06.001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RAI Revista de Administra??o e Inova??o","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1809203916300195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The resources invested in research do not guarantee an immediate practical application. Companies and government increasingly seek mechanisms for prioritizing R&D projects appropriately when resources are insufficient. This study's objective was to develop and present a methodology used to evaluate the portfolio of research and help choosing the best investments in research. This methodology was applied at the Butanta Institute, in Brazil, an organization responsible for researching and developing, among other medicines, vaccines and other chemicals, Onco BCG, a medication for the treatment of bladder cancer. In the article, we present and analyze the methodology used at Butanta Institute. Conclusions show that literature on R&D portfolio management advises the use of risk and return criteria, when choosing among projects. In the case study of Butanta, the methodology of choice was based more on the customer's perspective.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
健康产品研发项目分析
投入研究的资源并不能保证立即得到实际应用。当资源不足时,公司和政府越来越多地寻求机制来适当地优先考虑研发项目。本研究的目的是开发并提出一种方法,用于评估研究组合,并帮助选择最佳的研究投资。巴西的Butanta研究所采用了这一方法,该研究所负责研究和开发除其他药物、疫苗和其他化学品外,治疗膀胱癌的药物Onco BCG。在本文中,我们提出并分析了布坦塔研究所使用的方法。结论表明,研发项目组合管理的文献建议在选择项目时使用风险和回报标准。在Butanta的案例研究中,选择的方法更多地基于客户的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Why do small businesses innovate? Relevant factors of innovation in businesses participating in the Local Innovation Agents program in Rondônia (Amazon, Brazil) Product, process, marketing and organizational innovation in industries of the flat knitting sector Battery global value chain and its technological challenges for electric vehicle mobility An analysis of industrial districts and Triple Helix of innovation – a regional development experience in the south of the state of Rio de Janeiro
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1