Odyssey' Scientific Debate: Rhetoric STEM Education

Foteini Egglezou
{"title":"Odyssey' Scientific Debate: Rhetoric STEM Education","authors":"Foteini Egglezou","doi":"10.36253/978-88-5518-329-1.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Τhe Erasmus+ KA2 Odyssey project aims at introducing debates on STEM topics in European schools for cultivating the scientific, argumentative and critical literacy as well as the communication skills of students in secondary education (13-19 years old). In Greece, the testing phase (October 2019-June 2020) involved 18 STEM educators and 126 students from 11 schools. The debate format, which combined elements of Oxford and Public Forum, aimed at making students realize that scientific ideas and practices are not absolute, objective and immutable and therefore require discussions based on convincing arguments supported by relevant and sufficient evidence. The first findings of the project were encouraging, revealing that the rhetorical turn in the teaching of science through debates is purposeful for promoting advances in the modern STEM classroom despite the barriers that hinder analogous efforts.","PeriodicalId":168873,"journal":{"name":"Competing, cooperating, deciding: towards a model of deliberative debate","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Competing, cooperating, deciding: towards a model of deliberative debate","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36253/978-88-5518-329-1.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Τhe Erasmus+ KA2 Odyssey project aims at introducing debates on STEM topics in European schools for cultivating the scientific, argumentative and critical literacy as well as the communication skills of students in secondary education (13-19 years old). In Greece, the testing phase (October 2019-June 2020) involved 18 STEM educators and 126 students from 11 schools. The debate format, which combined elements of Oxford and Public Forum, aimed at making students realize that scientific ideas and practices are not absolute, objective and immutable and therefore require discussions based on convincing arguments supported by relevant and sufficient evidence. The first findings of the project were encouraging, revealing that the rhetorical turn in the teaching of science through debates is purposeful for promoting advances in the modern STEM classroom despite the barriers that hinder analogous efforts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
奥德赛科学辩论:修辞STEM教育
Τhe Erasmus+ KA2 Odyssey项目旨在在欧洲学校引入关于STEM主题的辩论,以培养中等教育(13-19岁)学生的科学、辩论和批判性素养以及沟通技巧。在希腊,测试阶段(2019年10月至2020年6月)涉及来自11所学校的18名STEM教育工作者和126名学生。辩论形式结合了牛津和公共论坛的元素,旨在让学生认识到科学思想和实践不是绝对的、客观的和不可改变的,因此需要基于有相关和充分证据支持的令人信服的论点进行讨论。该项目的第一个发现令人鼓舞,揭示了通过辩论进行科学教学的修辞转变有助于促进现代STEM课堂的进步,尽管存在阻碍类似努力的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Puer bonus communicandi peritus. Esercizi e strumenti per dibattere tra pari Il dibattito come rischio educativo A Rhetorical Model of Debating Improving Argumentative Skills in Education: Three Online Discussion Tools Odyssey' Scientific Debate: Rhetoric STEM Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1