ON THE NARRATOR IN MADAME BOVARY

Vasilii Tolmatchoff
{"title":"ON THE NARRATOR IN MADAME BOVARY","authors":"Vasilii Tolmatchoff","doi":"10.31249/litzhur/2021.53.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper written in polemics with the truisms of the Soviet literary criticism (identification of Flaubert with his narrator in Madame Bovary , Flaubert’s critical realism etc.) analyses in full detail a figure of the narrator in this novel, his methods of self-presentation, motives of narration, narrative metamorphoses. A particular attention is given to analysis of the narrator’s “we”, “nous”, “madness” and to the related images of “lie”, “mask”, negative search for Absolute, the embodiment and symbol of which in the novel is death, non-being. In context of lie, the characters of the novel, in-cluding Homais, are not opposed to each other but are the continuation of the narrator’s projections as well as of Flaubert’s personal views on writing. The paper actualises intertextuality of the novel corresponded with images of Saint Anthony, Don Quixote, King Lear, Hamlet and also of quest, fulfilled in a tradition of some apothetical mysticism or gnosticism.","PeriodicalId":246030,"journal":{"name":"Literaturovedcheskii Zhurnal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literaturovedcheskii Zhurnal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31249/litzhur/2021.53.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper written in polemics with the truisms of the Soviet literary criticism (identification of Flaubert with his narrator in Madame Bovary , Flaubert’s critical realism etc.) analyses in full detail a figure of the narrator in this novel, his methods of self-presentation, motives of narration, narrative metamorphoses. A particular attention is given to analysis of the narrator’s “we”, “nous”, “madness” and to the related images of “lie”, “mask”, negative search for Absolute, the embodiment and symbol of which in the novel is death, non-being. In context of lie, the characters of the novel, in-cluding Homais, are not opposed to each other but are the continuation of the narrator’s projections as well as of Flaubert’s personal views on writing. The paper actualises intertextuality of the novel corresponded with images of Saint Anthony, Don Quixote, King Lear, Hamlet and also of quest, fulfilled in a tradition of some apothetical mysticism or gnosticism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论《包法利夫人》中的叙述者
本文运用苏联文学批评的一些真理(《包法利夫人》中福楼拜与叙述者的认同、福楼拜的批判现实主义等),详细分析了这部小说中叙述者的形象、他的自我呈现方式、叙事动机、叙事变形。特别注意对叙述者的“我们”、“理智”、“疯狂”的分析,以及与之相关的“谎言”、“面具”、对绝对的消极寻找等意象,在小说中,绝对的体现和象征是死亡、非存在。在谎言的语境下,小说中的人物,包括霍玛斯,并不是彼此对立的,而是叙述者投射的延续,也是福楼拜个人写作观的延续。本文通过对圣安东尼、唐吉诃德、李尔王、哈姆雷特以及探索者等人物形象的分析,实现了小说的互文性,这种互文性是一种假意的神秘主义或诺斯替主义的传统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
MARINA TSVETAEVA IN THE BIOGRAPHY OF PRINCE D.P. SVYATOPOLK-MIRSKY “DETERMINE THE MEANING OF WORDS.”: ON THE SOURCES OF PUSHKIN’S MAXIM M.P. Pogodin about I.A. Krylov I.A. Krylov and his biographical myth ON THE ISSUE OF THE COMPLETE COLLECTION OF HISTORICAL AND PHILOLOGICAL WORKS OF M.P. POGODIN
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1