The right to remuneration of authors of the audiovisual work in accordance with the laws of the EU and Ukraine

V. Trotska
{"title":"The right to remuneration of authors of the audiovisual work in accordance with the laws of the EU and Ukraine","authors":"V. Trotska","doi":"10.33731/32023.282167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the study of the issues of the remuneration of authors for the use of an audiovisual work. It is substantiated that legal certainty and effective protection of authors' rights is an essential factor in the development of the audiovisual art. In this regard, the author studies the rules on protection of authors' rights in the context of ensuring their right to remuneration provided for in the laws of the EU Member States.The article provides a comparative analysis of the provisions of the laws of certain EU Member States which define who are the authors of an audiovisual work and who are entitled to receive the remuneration. It is established that there is no uniform approach to determining the list of authors of an audiovisual work in the laws of the EU Member States. It is clearly established that the author is the main director. Other persons who have made a creative contribution to the creation of an audiovisual work are defined in the laws at the discretion of the EU Member States. In most EU Member State laws, the authorsare recognized as: the screenwriter, the author of the music, specially created for use in the audiovisual work.In most laws, there is a presumption that the authors transfer their property rights to the producer, unless otherwise provided in the agreement. In cases determined by law, regardless of the transfer of property rights, authors have the inalienable right to receive the remuneration for the use of a work in certain ways. It is established that the laws of the EU Member States provide for the right to the equitable remuneration for reproduction for personal use (private copying), cable retransmission, and rental of copies. Other ways to use for which authors should be remunerated are established by the law at thediscretion of the country.The article provides examples from the copyright laws of Italy, Poland, Estonia, Spain, Switzerland, and the Netherlands. These examples prove that each country establishes, at its own discretion, the right to equitable the remuneration of authors for certain uses.The author concludes that ensuring the right to equitable the remuneration for authors is and remains an urgent issue for EU Member States.The article analyzes the provisions of the Law of Ukraine of Copyright and and Related Rights regarding the rights of authors to the remuneration for the use of an audiovisual work. Сonclusions and suggestions are made.","PeriodicalId":356184,"journal":{"name":"Theory and Practice of Intellectual Property","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and Practice of Intellectual Property","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33731/32023.282167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of the issues of the remuneration of authors for the use of an audiovisual work. It is substantiated that legal certainty and effective protection of authors' rights is an essential factor in the development of the audiovisual art. In this regard, the author studies the rules on protection of authors' rights in the context of ensuring their right to remuneration provided for in the laws of the EU Member States.The article provides a comparative analysis of the provisions of the laws of certain EU Member States which define who are the authors of an audiovisual work and who are entitled to receive the remuneration. It is established that there is no uniform approach to determining the list of authors of an audiovisual work in the laws of the EU Member States. It is clearly established that the author is the main director. Other persons who have made a creative contribution to the creation of an audiovisual work are defined in the laws at the discretion of the EU Member States. In most EU Member State laws, the authorsare recognized as: the screenwriter, the author of the music, specially created for use in the audiovisual work.In most laws, there is a presumption that the authors transfer their property rights to the producer, unless otherwise provided in the agreement. In cases determined by law, regardless of the transfer of property rights, authors have the inalienable right to receive the remuneration for the use of a work in certain ways. It is established that the laws of the EU Member States provide for the right to the equitable remuneration for reproduction for personal use (private copying), cable retransmission, and rental of copies. Other ways to use for which authors should be remunerated are established by the law at thediscretion of the country.The article provides examples from the copyright laws of Italy, Poland, Estonia, Spain, Switzerland, and the Netherlands. These examples prove that each country establishes, at its own discretion, the right to equitable the remuneration of authors for certain uses.The author concludes that ensuring the right to equitable the remuneration for authors is and remains an urgent issue for EU Member States.The article analyzes the provisions of the Law of Ukraine of Copyright and and Related Rights regarding the rights of authors to the remuneration for the use of an audiovisual work. Сonclusions and suggestions are made.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据欧盟和乌克兰法律,音像作品作者获得报酬的权利
本文致力于研究作者使用音像作品的报酬问题。事实证明,法律的确定性和作者权利的有效保护是视听艺术发展的必要因素。在这方面,笔者研究了欧盟成员国法律在保障作者获得报酬权的背景下对作者权利的保护规则。本文对某些欧盟成员国的法律规定进行了比较分析,这些规定界定了谁是音像作品的作者以及谁有权获得报酬。可以确定的是,在欧盟成员国的法律中没有统一的方法来确定音像作品的作者名单。很明显,作者是主要导演。对音像作品创作作出创造性贡献的其他人员由欧盟成员国酌情在法律中定义。在大多数欧盟成员国的法律中,作者被认为是:编剧,音乐的作者,专门为视听作品而创作的。在大多数法律中,除非协议中另有规定,否则假定作者将其财产权转让给生产者。在法律规定的情况下,无论产权是否转让,作者都有以某种方式使用作品获得报酬的不可剥夺的权利。欧盟成员国的法律规定了为个人使用的复制(私人复制)、有线转播和副本出租获得公平报酬的权利。作者应获得报酬的其他使用方式由国家法律酌情规定。本文提供了来自意大利、波兰、爱沙尼亚、西班牙、瑞士和荷兰版权法的例子。这些例子证明,每一个国家根据自己的酌处权,确立了对作者的某些用途给予公平报酬的权利。作者的结论是,确保作者获得公平报酬的权利对欧盟成员国来说仍然是一个紧迫的问题。本文分析了乌克兰《著作权及相关权法》中关于作者对音像作品的使用获得报酬的权利的规定。Сonclusions并提出建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Accelerated examination of patent applications for «green» technologies: foreign experience for Ukraine Draft Regulation of the European Union about artificial intelligence and related initiatives Intellectual property rights in the context of biology, medicine and pharmacy: a look into the future The sui generis right to non-original objects generated by a computer program: novelties of legal regulation ABUSE OF PATENTABILITY CRITERIA WHEN PATENTING INVENTIONS RELATED TO MEDICINES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1