Lean six sigma tools for improving administrative processes in different sectors: a systematic review

U.D.M.D. Ruwanpura, B. Perera, K. Ranadewa
{"title":"Lean six sigma tools for improving administrative processes in different sectors: a systematic review","authors":"U.D.M.D. Ruwanpura, B. Perera, K. Ranadewa","doi":"10.31705/wcs.2023.56","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lean Six Sigma (LSS) is widely accepted as an effective management concept in minimising wastes and variation of the processes. However, few studies can be found to integrate LSS for improving administrative processes in manufacturing and services industries. Out of the practicing LSS tools, identification of the most suitable LSS tools for each stage of LSS is vital to streamline the administrative process. Although, studies were conducted on lean implementation in different sectors in ad-hoc manner, dearth of studies were focused to compare the existing literature in detail. Therefore, the study aimed to conduct a systematic literature review (SLR) on LSS tools used in administrative processes in different sectors for every LSS stage. This SLR was conducted to addressing the above-mentioned research gap by adopting to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guideline for healthcare, education, public administration and other sectors. The initial repository comprised with 1817 and the final repository was comprised with 23 articles. The SLR has contributed to the theory by exploring suitable LSS tools and techniques for each DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analysis, Improvement, and Control) stages of LSS. Out of the identified tools, SIPOC and project charter can be recommended for the define stage whereas, process map is suggested for the measure stage. Further, Cause and effect analysis, Value Stream Mapping (VSM) and control charts are recommended for analysis, improvement and control stages. Further, some specific LSS tools were screened as a specifically applied to a particular sector. Ultimately, the results will propose to industry by applying appropriate LSS tools for administrative processes in different sectors which are not transformed into LSS incorporated internal environment.","PeriodicalId":221447,"journal":{"name":"11th World Construction Symposium - 2023","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"11th World Construction Symposium - 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31705/wcs.2023.56","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lean Six Sigma (LSS) is widely accepted as an effective management concept in minimising wastes and variation of the processes. However, few studies can be found to integrate LSS for improving administrative processes in manufacturing and services industries. Out of the practicing LSS tools, identification of the most suitable LSS tools for each stage of LSS is vital to streamline the administrative process. Although, studies were conducted on lean implementation in different sectors in ad-hoc manner, dearth of studies were focused to compare the existing literature in detail. Therefore, the study aimed to conduct a systematic literature review (SLR) on LSS tools used in administrative processes in different sectors for every LSS stage. This SLR was conducted to addressing the above-mentioned research gap by adopting to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guideline for healthcare, education, public administration and other sectors. The initial repository comprised with 1817 and the final repository was comprised with 23 articles. The SLR has contributed to the theory by exploring suitable LSS tools and techniques for each DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analysis, Improvement, and Control) stages of LSS. Out of the identified tools, SIPOC and project charter can be recommended for the define stage whereas, process map is suggested for the measure stage. Further, Cause and effect analysis, Value Stream Mapping (VSM) and control charts are recommended for analysis, improvement and control stages. Further, some specific LSS tools were screened as a specifically applied to a particular sector. Ultimately, the results will propose to industry by applying appropriate LSS tools for administrative processes in different sectors which are not transformed into LSS incorporated internal environment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精益六西格玛工具用于改善不同部门的管理流程:系统审查
精益六西格玛(LSS)被广泛接受为一种有效的管理理念,以尽量减少浪费和变化的过程。然而,很少有研究可以发现整合LSS改善制造业和服务业的行政程序。在实践中的LSS工具中,为LSS的每个阶段确定最合适的LSS工具对于简化管理流程至关重要。虽然对不同部门的精益实施进行了专门的研究,但缺乏研究的重点是详细比较现有文献。因此,本研究旨在对不同部门行政流程中每个阶段使用的LSS工具进行系统的文献综述(SLR)。本次SLR旨在通过采用医疗、教育、公共行政和其他部门的系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA) 2020指南来解决上述研究差距。最初的存储库包含1817篇文章,最终的存储库包含23篇文章。SLR通过为LSS的每个DMAIC(定义、测量、分析、改进和控制)阶段探索合适的LSS工具和技术,为理论做出了贡献。在确定的工具中,SIPOC和项目章程可以推荐用于定义阶段,而过程图则建议用于度量阶段。此外,建议在分析、改进和控制阶段使用因果分析、价值流图(VSM)和控制图。此外,一些特定的LSS工具被筛选为专门适用于特定部门的工具。最终,结果将建议行业通过应用适当的LSS工具,在不同部门的行政流程,而不是转化为LSS纳入内部环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Economic models of climate change: systematic review of benefits, limitations, and future directions Adaptation of blockchain and smart contracts to the construction industry of developing countries A Taxonomy of waterproofing systems for high-rise building projects in the tropics Potential use of digital twin for construction progress monitoring Adoptability of bioplastic as a sustainable material in Sri Lankan building construction industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1