Can Chinese grandparents say no? A comparison of grandmothers in two Asian cities

E. Goh, Sheng-li Wang
{"title":"Can Chinese grandparents say no? A comparison of grandmothers in two Asian cities","authors":"E. Goh, Sheng-li Wang","doi":"10.1332/policypress/9781447340645.003.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines two dominant research constructs namely, ‘cultural obligation’ and ‘intergenerational reciprocity’ in caring for grandchildren in Chinese societies – Fuzhou and Singapore. Drawing on Social Relational Theory (SRT), it examines the agency of grandmothers through unpacking the rationales for their involvement or non-involvement in childcare, and the goals and meanings they ascribe to their decisions. Grandparents are viewed as agents: capable of setting goals, devising plans, strategies and taking actions to achieve their goals in the relational contexts with their adult children and grandchildren. The key research questions addressed in this chapter are : (1) to what extent do grandmothers in Fuzhou and Singapore are influenced in their decisions to provide childcare by similar yet diverse Confucian roots; (2) understanding the socio-cultural discourses of grandparenthood in Fuzhou and Singapore; and (3) whether such discourses will constrain or facilitate their sense of agency in decision making.","PeriodicalId":266833,"journal":{"name":"Grandparenting Practices around the World","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grandparenting Practices around the World","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447340645.003.0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This chapter examines two dominant research constructs namely, ‘cultural obligation’ and ‘intergenerational reciprocity’ in caring for grandchildren in Chinese societies – Fuzhou and Singapore. Drawing on Social Relational Theory (SRT), it examines the agency of grandmothers through unpacking the rationales for their involvement or non-involvement in childcare, and the goals and meanings they ascribe to their decisions. Grandparents are viewed as agents: capable of setting goals, devising plans, strategies and taking actions to achieve their goals in the relational contexts with their adult children and grandchildren. The key research questions addressed in this chapter are : (1) to what extent do grandmothers in Fuzhou and Singapore are influenced in their decisions to provide childcare by similar yet diverse Confucian roots; (2) understanding the socio-cultural discourses of grandparenthood in Fuzhou and Singapore; and (3) whether such discourses will constrain or facilitate their sense of agency in decision making.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国的祖父母能说不吗?两个亚洲城市的祖母比较
本章考察了两个主要的研究结构,即“文化义务”和“代际互惠”在中国社会照顾孙辈-福州和新加坡。利用社会关系理论(SRT),它通过拆解祖母参与或不参与儿童保育的理由,以及他们赋予自己决定的目标和意义,来研究祖母的代理作用。祖父母被视为代理人:能够在与成年子女和孙辈的关系中设定目标、制定计划、策略并采取行动来实现他们的目标。本章讨论的关键研究问题是:(1)福州和新加坡的祖母在提供儿童保育的决定中受到相似但不同的儒家根源的影响程度如何;(2)了解福州和新加坡祖父母的社会文化话语;(3)这些话语是否会限制或促进他们在决策中的代理意识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Transnational grandparenting: the intersection of transnationalism and translocality Transnational grandmother–grandchild relationships in the context of migration from Lithuania to Ireland How grandparents influence the religiosity of their grandchildren: a mixed-methods study of three-generation families in the United States The demography of grandparenthood in 16 European countries and two North American countries Can Chinese grandparents say no? A comparison of grandmothers in two Asian cities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1