The Important Role of Time Limits when Consumers Choose their Time in Service

P. Feldman, Ella Segev
{"title":"The Important Role of Time Limits when Consumers Choose their Time in Service","authors":"P. Feldman, Ella Segev","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3424317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A main challenge that service providers face when managing service systems is how to generate value and regulate congestion at the same time. To this end, classical queueing models suggest managers charge per-use fees and invest in capacity to speed up the service. However, in discretionary services, in which consumers value time in service and choose how long to stay, per-use fees result in suboptimal performance and speeding up does not apply. We study a queueing model of a service provider and rational consumers who are heterogenous in their requirements for service duration. Consumers incur disutility from waiting and choose whether to join and how long to spend in service. We consider time limits as a novel mechanism that may help in controlling congestion. Time limits put a cap on the maximum time that customers can spend in service. We analyze their effectiveness when combined with two price schemes: per-use fees and price rates. Time limits are effective because they reduce time in service and impact waiting times and joining behavior. Revenue maximizing firms and social planners who maximize social welfare benefit from implementing time limits in addition to price rates. Social planners who seek to maximize consumer welfare, however, focus on regulating congestion and should, therefore, offer the service for free but implement time limits if congestion levels are high. The attractiveness of time limits goes further. We show that time limits are not only a useful lever that works well when combined with simple price mechanisms, but they are in fact optimal when congestion is high. Service providers can achieve the first-best outcome and extract all customer surplus by coupling a time limit with an optimal price mechanism. The attractiveness of time limits stems from their ability to reduce not only the average time spent in service, but also its variance. This is highly effective in settings in which customers’ service times impose externalities on others’ waiting times. Thus, we conclude that providers of discretionary services should set time limits when congestion is an issue. This paper was accepted by Vishal Gaur, operations management.","PeriodicalId":112052,"journal":{"name":"Organizations & Markets: Formal & Informal Structures eJournal","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organizations & Markets: Formal & Informal Structures eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3424317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

A main challenge that service providers face when managing service systems is how to generate value and regulate congestion at the same time. To this end, classical queueing models suggest managers charge per-use fees and invest in capacity to speed up the service. However, in discretionary services, in which consumers value time in service and choose how long to stay, per-use fees result in suboptimal performance and speeding up does not apply. We study a queueing model of a service provider and rational consumers who are heterogenous in their requirements for service duration. Consumers incur disutility from waiting and choose whether to join and how long to spend in service. We consider time limits as a novel mechanism that may help in controlling congestion. Time limits put a cap on the maximum time that customers can spend in service. We analyze their effectiveness when combined with two price schemes: per-use fees and price rates. Time limits are effective because they reduce time in service and impact waiting times and joining behavior. Revenue maximizing firms and social planners who maximize social welfare benefit from implementing time limits in addition to price rates. Social planners who seek to maximize consumer welfare, however, focus on regulating congestion and should, therefore, offer the service for free but implement time limits if congestion levels are high. The attractiveness of time limits goes further. We show that time limits are not only a useful lever that works well when combined with simple price mechanisms, but they are in fact optimal when congestion is high. Service providers can achieve the first-best outcome and extract all customer surplus by coupling a time limit with an optimal price mechanism. The attractiveness of time limits stems from their ability to reduce not only the average time spent in service, but also its variance. This is highly effective in settings in which customers’ service times impose externalities on others’ waiting times. Thus, we conclude that providers of discretionary services should set time limits when congestion is an issue. This paper was accepted by Vishal Gaur, operations management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
消费者选择服务时间时,时间限制的重要作用
服务提供商在管理服务系统时面临的一个主要挑战是如何同时创造价值和调节拥塞。为此,经典的排队模型建议管理者按次收费,并投资于容量以加快服务速度。然而,在可自由支配的服务中,消费者看重服务的时间并选择停留的时间,按次收费会导致性能不理想,加速也不适用。我们研究了服务提供者和理性消费者的排队模型,它们对服务持续时间的需求是异构的。消费者因等待而产生负效用,并选择是否加入以及在服务中花费多长时间。我们认为时间限制是一种有助于控制拥堵的新机制。时间限制限制了顾客在服务中所能花费的最长时间。我们分析了它们与两种价格方案(按次收费和费率)相结合时的有效性。时间限制是有效的,因为它们减少了服务时间,影响了等待时间和加入行为。收入最大化的企业和社会规划者将社会福利最大化,除了实行价格限制外,还能从时间限制中获益。然而,追求消费者福利最大化的社会规划者关注的是控制拥堵,因此应该免费提供服务,但如果拥堵程度高,则应实施时间限制。时间限制的吸引力还不止于此。我们表明,时间限制不仅是一个有用的杠杆,在与简单的价格机制相结合时效果良好,而且在拥堵严重时,它们实际上是最优的。服务提供商可以通过将时间限制与最优价格机制相结合来实现最优结果并提取所有客户剩余。时间限制的吸引力在于它不仅能够减少平均服务时间,而且还能减少平均服务时间的变化。这在顾客的服务时间对其他人的等待时间施加外部性的情况下是非常有效的。因此,我们得出结论,当拥塞成为一个问题时,自由裁量服务的提供者应该设定时间限制。本文被运营管理专业的Vishal Gaur接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Origins of Common Identity: Evidence from Alsace-Lorraine The Important Role of Time Limits when Consumers Choose their Time in Service Employment as a Relational Obligation to Work Information System Development Plan for APC Laundry House Subjective Beliefs about Contract Enforceability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1