Damage probability versus damage density: analysis from tests using small beams versus large beams

Laser Damage Pub Date : 2020-10-07 DOI:10.1117/12.2571834
L. Lamaignère, M. Veinhard, F. Tournemenne, C. Bouyer, R. Parreault, R. Courchinoux, J. Natoli, C. Rouyer, S. Bouillet
{"title":"Damage probability versus damage density: analysis from tests using small beams versus large beams","authors":"L. Lamaignère, M. Veinhard, F. Tournemenne, C. Bouyer, R. Parreault, R. Courchinoux, J. Natoli, C. Rouyer, S. Bouillet","doi":"10.1117/12.2571834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper aims to compare the results obtained with the same laser source with a large beam and with small beams. These latest were shaped from phase objects implemented to obtain several small beams from a single larger beam. The consistency of the results from both sets of measurements is shown. It validates the assumptions made and the specific mathematical treatments implemented to establish the link between the two approaches. It also validates and strengthens the approach developed from the rasterscan procedure used to measure damage densities from the scanning with beams of small dimensions. This shows that small beam tests are reasonably representative of tests carried out with large beams.","PeriodicalId":202227,"journal":{"name":"Laser Damage","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laser Damage","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2571834","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The paper aims to compare the results obtained with the same laser source with a large beam and with small beams. These latest were shaped from phase objects implemented to obtain several small beams from a single larger beam. The consistency of the results from both sets of measurements is shown. It validates the assumptions made and the specific mathematical treatments implemented to establish the link between the two approaches. It also validates and strengthens the approach developed from the rasterscan procedure used to measure damage densities from the scanning with beams of small dimensions. This shows that small beam tests are reasonably representative of tests carried out with large beams.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
损伤概率与损伤密度:小梁与大梁试验分析
本文的目的是比较相同的激光源在大光束和小光束下得到的结果。这些最新的是由相位物体形成的,实现了从一个更大的光束中获得几个小光束。显示了两组测量结果的一致性。它验证了所做的假设和具体的数学处理,以建立两种方法之间的联系。它还验证并加强了用于测量小尺寸光束扫描损伤密度的光栅扫描程序的方法。这表明小梁试验可以合理地代表用大梁进行的试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
All-glass metasurface laser optics for lensing, antireflections, and waveplates Laser-induced damage of dielectric-enhanced surface-modified single-point-diamond-turned Al-6061 multiband mirrors Optical damage considerations in the design of the matter in extreme condition upgrade (MEC-U) laser systems Broadband, 920-nm mirror thin film damage competition Temporally and spatially resolved photoluminescence of laser-induced damage sites of fused silica
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1